Problem 2Carina Company produces sanitation products after processing specialized chemicals; Thefollowing relates to its activities:⚫ 1 Kilogram of chemicals purchased for $2000 and with an additional $1000 isprocessed into 400 grams of Crystals and 80 litres of a Cleaning agent. At split-off, agram of Crystal can be sold for $1 and the Cleaning agent can be sold for $4 per litre.⚫ At an additional cost of $400, Carina can process the 400 grams of Crystal into 500grams of Detergent that can be sold for $2 per gram. The 80 litres of Cleaning agent ispackaged at an additional cost of $300 and made into 200 packs of Softener that canbe sold for $2 per pack.Required:1. Allocate the joint cost to the Detergent and the Softener using the following:a. Sales value at split-off methodb. NRV method2. Should Carina have processed each of the products further? What effect does the allocationmethod have on this decision?

Carica Company: Joint Cost Allocation1. Joint Cost Allocation:a. Sales Value at Split-Off…

Answered: Problem 2 Carina Company produces…

Marketing

20th Edition

ISBN:9780357033791

Author:Pride, William M

Publisher:Pride, William M

Chapter19: Pricing Concepts

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6DRQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Scenario 3 Ben Gibson, the purchasing manager at Coastal Products, was reviewing purchasing expenditures for packaging materials with Jeff Joyner. Ben was particularly disturbed about the amount spent on corrugated boxes purchased from Southeastern Corrugated. Ben said, I dont like the salesman from that company. He comes around here acting like he owns the place. He loves to tell us about his fancy car, house, and vacations. It seems to me he must be making too much money off of us! Jeff responded that he heard Southeastern Corrugated was going to ask for a price increase to cover the rising costs of raw material paper stock. Jeff further stated that Southeastern would probably ask for more than what was justified simply from rising paper stock costs. After the meeting, Ben decided he had heard enough. After all, he prided himself on being a results-oriented manager. There was no way he was going to allow that salesman to keep taking advantage of Coastal Products. Ben called Jeff and told him it was time to rebid the corrugated contract before Southeastern came in with a price increase request. Who did Jeff know that might be interested in the business? Jeff replied he had several companies in mind to include in the bidding process. These companies would surely come in at a lower price, partly because they used lower-grade boxes that would probably work well enough in Coastal Products process. Jeff also explained that these suppliers were not serious contenders for the business. Their purpose was to create competition with the bids. Ben told Jeff to make sure that Southeastern was well aware that these new suppliers were bidding on the contract. He also said to make sure the suppliers knew that price was going to be the determining factor in this quote, because he considered corrugated boxes to be a standard industry item. As the Marketing Manager for Southeastern Corrugated, what would you do upon receiving the request for quotation from Coastal Products?
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.
The Tinkan Company produces one-pound cans for the Canadian salmon industry. Each year the salmon spawn during a 24-hour period and must be canned immediately. Tinkan has the following agreement with the salmon industry. The company can deliver as many cans as it chooses. Then the salmon are caught. For each can by which Tinkan falls short of the salmon industrys needs, the company pays the industry a 2 penalty. Cans cost Tinkan 1 to produce and are sold by Tinkan for 2 per can. If any cans are left over, they are returned to Tinkan and the company reimburses the industry 2 for each extra can. These extra cans are put in storage for next year. Each year a can is held in storage, a carrying cost equal to 20% of the cans production cost is incurred. It is well known that the number of salmon harvested during a year is strongly related to the number of salmon harvested the previous year. In fact, using past data, Tinkan estimates that the harvest size in year t, Ht (measured in the number of cans required), is related to the harvest size in the previous year, Ht1, by the equation Ht = Ht1et where et is normally distributed with mean 1.02 and standard deviation 0.10. Tinkan plans to use the following production strategy. For some value of x, it produces enough cans at the beginning of year t to bring its inventory up to x+Ht, where Ht is the predicted harvest size in year t. Then it delivers these cans to the salmon industry. For example, if it uses x = 100,000, the predicted harvest size is 500,000 cans, and 80,000 cans are already in inventory, then Tinkan produces and delivers 520,000 cans. Given that the harvest size for the previous year was 550,000 cans, use simulation to help Tinkan develop a production strategy that maximizes its expected profit over the next 20 years. Assume that the company begins year 1 with an initial inventory of 300,000 cans.
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?
1. Foxie Owl’s Besty Bagel shop makes fresh bagels. She has to buy raw materials fresh every day for selling on that day. She wants to know exactly how much should she spend on raw materials. Foxie did some analysis over the past month and came back with the following numbers: Daily demand was equally likely to be 200, 225, 250, 275, or 300 bagels. What should be the number of bagels on hand to satisfy a Fill Rate requirement of 96%, rounded to next integer value? Group of answer choices 300 275 286 263 2. Suppose that instead of a discrete demand distribution, Foxie’s shop determines that the daily demand for bagels is normally distributed, with a mean of 250 and a standard deviation of 35. Foxie still wants a Fill Rate of 98%. What is the appropriate level of on-hand inventory for Foxie’s shop? Group of answer choices 263 274 257 270
The Ace Manufacturing Company has orders for three similar products. Orders (units) Product Min A s.t. B с 1 Three machines are available for the manufacturing operations. All three machines can produce all the products at the same production rate. However, due to varying defect percentages of each product on each machine, the unit costs of the products vary depending on the machine used. Machine capacities for the next week and the unit costs are shown below. Machine 2 3 LB A C B с 1 Product 112₂ 3 Machine 1 Capacity Machine 2 Capacity Machine 3 Capacity 2,200 Product A Orders Product C Orders 400 xij≥0 for all i, j. 1,400 Product B Orders Capacity (units) 1,500 1,500 Use the transportation model to develop the minimum cost production schedule for the products and machines. (a) Show the linear programming formulation. (Let XA1 be the number of units of product A produced by machine 1, X;; be the number of units of product i produced by machine j, etc.) 1,100 $1.00 $1.30 $1.10 1 $1.20…
A shipment of 40 pounds of fresh salmon is purchased for $4.50 per pound. The yield of the fish is 27.2 pounds after filleting. What is the yield % of the drawn salmon? What is the EP cost per pound? What is the cost for a 5-ounce portion?
onsider an outpatient surgery center that is located in a rectangular building that is 90 feet by 50 feet. There are six departments, each of which is 30 feet by 25 feet in size. Using the "Patient Traffic per Week" matrix. Registration Exam Operating Recovery Labs/Tests X-ray Registration 0 130 30 0 60 20 Exam 0 0 110 40 30 25 Operating 0 0 0 100 10 10 Recovery 0 0 0 0 5 15 Labs/Test 0 0 0 0 0 15 X-ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 a. Determine the total cost per week of the following initial layout. Assuming it cost $4 to move patients between adjacent rooms. Use rectilinear distances Registration X-ray Exam Operating Labs/Tests Recovery b. Design the effective layout that produces the minimum cost per week. show breakdown of work
The Chineke Group of Company manufactures two products, namely product B and product P, and provides you with the following information: Prod. B Prod. P Selling price per unit 80.00 50.00 Less cost of sales: Direct material A @ R5.00 per kg 15.00 10.00 Direct material B @ R4.00 per kg 8.00 12.00 Direct labour @ R6.00 per hour 12.00 6.00 Variable manufacturing overhead @ R5.00 per labour hour 10.00 5.00 Fixed manufacturing overhead per unit 5.00 5.00 Gross profit 30.00 12.00 Less sales & administrative costs: Variable 6.00 4.00 Fixed 10.00 5.00 Net profit per unit 14.00 3.00 Take note of the following constraints: Material A available 360 kg Material B available 360 kg Labour hours available…
XYZ Leather Company manufactures and sells two products, wallets and belts, in its two-department plant. Operating data pertaining to the two products are as follows: Wallets Belts Selling price per unit P30 P50 Cost per unit: Variable manufacturing costs P8 P15 Variable marketing costs P2 P3 Fixed manufacturing costs P5 P5 Fixed marketing costs P6 P1 Cutting Finishing…
In past 4 weeks, AOC (Arab oil company) started producing and distributing national engine oil to substitute French Total and Esso brands. Production reported to be in thousands: 2, 4, 3, 5 TG Thousand Gallons). AOC production will be calculated after 5 more weeks.

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Marketing

ISBN:

9780357033791

Author:

Pride, William M

Publisher:

South Western Educational Publishing

Practical Management Science

Operations Management

ISBN:

9781337406659

Author:

WINSTON, Wayne L.

Publisher:

Cengage,

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

Operations Management

ISBN:

9781285869681

Author:

Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Marketing

ISBN:

9780357033791

Author:

Pride, William M

Publisher:

South Western Educational Publishing

Practical Management Science

Operations Management

ISBN:

9781337406659

Author:

WINSTON, Wayne L.

Publisher:

Cengage,

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

Operations Management

ISBN:

9781285869681

Author:

Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS