Microeconomics
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781260507140
Author: David C. Colander
Publisher: McGraw Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 8, Problem 9IP
To determine
Impact of high tax on gasoline.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
What are the costs of pollution according to the Lancet Commission on pollution and health? Why are those numbers likely to be an underestimate? Explain.
What happens in the market for a good that pollutes the air when it is manufactured if government decides to tax consumers when the product is purchased? Will this reduce the amount of air pollution?
It’s common to think that reducing pollution is necessarily costly because to reduce pollution we need to tax firms who will then produce less. But can you think of one example in which pollution might not only be unpleasant but might actually reduce production?
Chapter 8 Solutions
Microeconomics
Ch. 8.1 - Prob. 1QCh. 8.1 - Prob. 2QCh. 8.1 - Prob. 3QCh. 8.1 - Prob. 4QCh. 8.1 - Prob. 5QCh. 8.1 - Prob. 6QCh. 8.1 - Prob. 7QCh. 8.1 - Prob. 8QCh. 8.1 - Prob. 9QCh. 8.1 - Prob. 10Q
Ch. 8.W - Prob. 1QECh. 8.W - Prob. 2QECh. 8.W - Prob. 3QECh. 8.W - Prob. 4QECh. 8.W - Prob. 5QECh. 8.W - Prob. 6QECh. 8.W - Prob. 7QECh. 8.W - Prob. 8QECh. 8.W - Prob. 9QECh. 8.W - Prob. 10QECh. 8.W - Prob. 11QECh. 8.W - Prob. 12QECh. 8.W - Prob. 13QECh. 8.W - Prob. 14QECh. 8.W - Prob. 1QAPCh. 8.W - Prob. 2QAPCh. 8.W - Prob. 3QAPCh. 8.W - Prob. 4QAPCh. 8.W - Prob. 5QAPCh. 8.W - Prob. 1IPCh. 8.W - Prob. 2IPCh. 8.W - Prob. 3IPCh. 8.W - Prob. 4IPCh. 8.W - Prob. 5IPCh. 8.W1 - Prob. 1QCh. 8.W1 - Prob. 2QCh. 8.W1 - Prob. 3QCh. 8.W1 - Prob. 4QCh. 8.W1 - Prob. 5QCh. 8.W1 - Prob. 6QCh. 8.W1 - Prob. 7QCh. 8.W1 - Prob. 8QCh. 8.W1 - Prob. 9QCh. 8.W1 - Prob. 10QCh. 8 - Prob. 1QECh. 8 - Prob. 2QECh. 8 - How would an economist likely respond to the...Ch. 8 - Prob. 4QECh. 8 - Prob. 5QECh. 8 - Prob. 6QECh. 8 - Prob. 7QECh. 8 - Prob. 8QECh. 8 - Prob. 9QECh. 8 - Prob. 10QECh. 8 - Prob. 11QECh. 8 - Prob. 12QECh. 8 - Prob. 13QECh. 8 - Prob. 14QECh. 8 - Prob. 15QECh. 8 - Prob. 16QECh. 8 - Prob. 17QECh. 8 - Prob. 18QECh. 8 - Prob. 19QECh. 8 - Prob. 20QECh. 8 - Prob. 21QECh. 8 - Prob. 22QECh. 8 - Prob. 23QECh. 8 - Prob. 24QECh. 8 - Prob. 1QAPCh. 8 - Prob. 2QAPCh. 8 - Prob. 3QAPCh. 8 - Prob. 4QAPCh. 8 - Prob. 5QAPCh. 8 - Prob. 1IPCh. 8 - Prob. 2IPCh. 8 - Prob. 3IPCh. 8 - Prob. 4IPCh. 8 - Prob. 5IPCh. 8 - Prob. 6IPCh. 8 - Prob. 7IPCh. 8 - Prob. 8IPCh. 8 - Prob. 9IPCh. 8 - Prob. 10IP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- What happens in the market for a good that pollutes the air when it is manufactured if government decides to tax its production? Will this reduce the amount of air pollution?arrow_forwardWhat are pollution havens? How are they created or why do they exist? Why do economists think they may change over time and develop policies to reduce pollution?arrow_forwardWhat would be an example of a negative externality? What would be an example of a positive externality? What types of regulations do you think are the most effective to induce firms to pollute less?arrow_forward
- Economists Kenneth Chay and Michael Greenstone found that in the two years following the passage of the Clean Air Act of 1970, the sharp reduction in air pollution also led to a decline in infant deaths. Although this and other studies provide compelling evidence of the link between pollution and infant health, it is not clear that reductions from the much lower levels of ambient pollution today would have the same effect. Which of the following reasons could explain this? A. Today, the level of pollution is much higher. Therefore, it will take a much larger reduction in air pollution to reap benefits similar to those in 1970. B. When levels of pollution are high, the marginal benefit of reducing pollution also is high. It follows therefore that the benefit of reducing air pollution in 1970 would be much higher than the benefit from a proportional reduction in air pollution today when the level of pollution is much lower. C. When levels of pollution are…arrow_forwardHow do economists determine the optimal amount of pollution control?arrow_forwardPollution is a negative externality. Why is it that the social optimum in a market that generates pollution will, generally, not result in zero pollution?arrow_forward
- Imagine the government of California has proposed a new tax on vehicles based on the amount of emissions they produce in a year. In 2019, there will be 20 tons of emissions produced. The governor’s office has run the calculations and found that the socially optimal level is 14 tons and the marginal damage from each unit of pollution is $150. Imagine there are two types of drivers in California: commuters and non-commuters. Imagine that the marginal cost of reducing pollution for commuters is MCA_C=150Q and the marginal cost of reducing pollution for non-commuters is MCA_N=30Q. Each type initially created ten tons of pollution each. Their total cost of reductions is equal to TCA_C=75Q^2 and TCA_N=15Q^2. How much would each type choose to reduce under the tax? Imagine the governor instead suggested forcing all drivers to reduce their emissions by 30% from their 2019 levels. How would the costs of reduction here compare to the taxation case (please provide actual numbers)? Do you…arrow_forwardIn which way could smoking exert a positive externality on others?arrow_forwardWhat is negative externalities?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning