To Explain: The three limits to rational decision making.
Explanation of Solution
Limits to rational decision making has been classified in three areas:
(1) Limited cognitive ability:
This limit is related to the complex decision or the decisions which requires some calculation. There are decisions which involves uncertainty, for example, the person may be able to work with probabilities and expected values, investment decision may require to understand the formulas of present discounted values. A person may make errors in doing complex calculations or avoid doing calculation or rely on some other person. So, a good calculating machine may perform the calculation quickly and make the right decision.
(2) Limited willpower:
This limit is important for making vigorous decisions , the decisions which requires some sort of timing element where the decisions taken may have long term implications. For example, A student may make plan to study for the upcoming test that how much he / she will study before one week of the test date. when the time comes for study, the lure for television , mobile phone or video games may be so strong that it may abandon the whole plan of study. A student may regret also for not being able to study. There are also many self control problems in many things like diet , smoking, drinking and so on. The model of self control problem where people weigh their well being more when they are actually living at that moment than the time they were planning ahead of it.
(3) Limited self-interest:
People may not just care about their own payoff , income or consumption, they may care about others also. his is not entirely foreign concept. For example , the sacrifices parent do for their children or other family members. There are more complex interpersonal values that would be difficult for standard model. People may not only care about the income , consumption that they and others end up with. They will get broader social goals directly as fairness and justice.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 17 Solutions
EBK INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS AND ITS
- Describe two decision-making traps identified in Chapter 11 of your text that affected important choices you have made in your lifearrow_forwardHow is the Rational decision making a complex process?arrow_forwardWhat is the goal of behavioral economics? Group of answer choices To eliminate the consumers’ state of mind from consideration in economic analysis. To shift economic theory from a mathematical base to more of a psychological study. To integrate the insights of psychology into economics to enrich our understanding of decision-making. To study consumer behavior over time rather than behavior in the moment and integrate these insights in economic analysis.arrow_forward
- You are on a cruise in the Caribbean Sea, which cost $1,000. On this particular day you have the choice between two activities, both of which would provide marginal mental benefits to your state of mind. The first is a scuba diving trip whose cost was included in the price of the cruise (you get to swim with a school of hammerheads). The second is a shopping spree on St. Thomas that would cost you $500. Which costs and benefits (select all that apply) should you consider when deciding which activity to undergo? The $1,000 cost of the cruise. All of the above. The marginal benefits of the shopping trip. The $500 cost of the shopping trip. The marginal benefits of the scuba trip.arrow_forwarda) Trade-offs are important part of economic decision making. You are supposed to Analyze and explain any three trade-offs that you face in your life. b) You plan to study on weekend and your friends ask you to go to a farm house with them. What do you think is the true cost of spending your weekend on a farmhouse with friends? c) You plan to spend your weekend working at your father’s superstore for a wage, but your friends ask you go play cricket at the weekend. What do you think is the true cost of spending your weekend playing cricket with friends?arrow_forwardDescribe the procedure of considering economic decisions?arrow_forward
- Mon poogle weld ascher andes one hamburger and one order of French fries, rather than two hamburgers and no Preech fries. Explain why economists consider this an example of rational decision makingarrow_forwardSuppose you observe a person's answer to two decision problems. Problem 1: You are offered $40 today. What is the minimum amount x you demand one month from today in order to be willing to give up the $40 now? Answer: x = 52. Problem 2: Your are offered $40 today. What is the minimum amount x you demand one year from today in order to be willing to give up the $40 now? Answer: $60. 1. Demonstrate that the rational model of time preferences is violated for this choice pattern. 2. Derive this individual's B and d for the hyperbolic time discounting model. 3. Suppose the utility you get from eating ice cream now is 10 utils. But you pay a cost of -4 utils per hour for the next 4 hours, because it gives you indigestion and makes you feel lethargic. If your hourly B and d for this problem are B = .6 and d = .9, ... 1. What is the total discounted utility of eating ice cream now? 2. What is your total discounted utility now of planning to eat ice cream after lunch tomorrow? 3. Do you eat ice…arrow_forwardThink of an economic decision you made recently wherein the benefit outweighed the cost (or the cost outweighed the benefit).arrow_forward
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage LearningExploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc