The net present costs of the two programs.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 17, Problem 10E

a)

To determine

To describe: The net present costs of the two programs.

a)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Net present cost in first and second alternatives are $431.35 and $3,174.1 respectively. Total discounted cost of second alternative is greater than the first alternative

Explanation of Solution

Present value of cost of first alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=200(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=200(1 ( 1+r ) n )=200(1 1.1)=200(.909)=181.8

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 181.8

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=200(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=200(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=200(1 1.331)=200(.751)=150.2

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 150.2

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=100(1 1.464)=100(.683)=68.3

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 68.3

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=50(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the fourth year is,

(PV)=50(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=50(1 1.610)=50(.621)=31.05

So, the cost incurred in the fourth year = 31.05

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=181.8+150.2+68.3+31.05=$431.35

Present value of cost of second alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=700(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=700(1 ( 1+.10 ))=700(1 1.1)=700(.909)=636.3

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 636.3

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=1800(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=1800(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=1800(1 1.331)=1800(.751)=1351.8

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 1351.8

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=1,100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=1,100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=1,100(1 1.464)=1,100(.683)=751.3

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 751.3

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=700(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=700(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=700(1 1.610)=700(.621)=434.7

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 434.7

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=636.3+1351.8+751.3+434.7=$3,174.1

Total discounted cost of second alternative is greater than the first alternative.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction: The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

b)

To determine

To describe:

The cost and benefit analysis of two programs.

b)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Based on the cost and benefit analysis second alternative is less as compare to first one.

Explanation of Solution

Discountedprofit from first alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=50(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=50(1 ( 1+.10 ) n )=50(1 1.1)=50(.909)=45.45

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 45.45

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=100(1 1.331)=100(.751)=75.1

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 75.1

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=250(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=250(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=250(1 1.464)=250(.683)=170.75

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 170.75

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the fourth year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=100(1 1.610)=100(.621)=62.1

So, the cost incurred in the fourth year = 62.1

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=45.45+75.1+170.75+62.1=$353.4Thosand

Discounted profit of second alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=150(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=150(1 ( 1+.10 ))=150(1 1.1)=150(.909)=136.35

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 136.35

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=225(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=225(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=225(1 1.331)=225(.751)=168.97

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 168.97

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=250(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=250(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=250(1 1.464)=250(.683)=170.75

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 170.75

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=300(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=300(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=300(1 1.610)=300(.621)=186.3

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 186.3

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=136.35+168.97+170.75+186.3=$662.37Thousand

Benefit-cost ratio of the first alternative

Benefit-cost Ratio=present value of benefitspresent value ofcosts

=353.4431.35=0.819

Benefit-cost ratio of the second alternative

Benefit-cost Ratio=present value of benefitspresent value ofcosts

=662.373174.1=0.208

Based on the cost and benefit analysis second alternative is less as compare to first one.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

c)

To determine

To describe:

The ambiguous choice between the two alternatives and the factors are likely to weigh on the ultimate choice.

c)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Government can adopt the second alternative.

Explanation of Solution

From the costs and the benefits analysis, it is indicated that the government must choose the first alternative instead of second ones. But the further insight into the lives saved and injuries prevented is required. The first alternative shows that expenditure reduces from $1000 thousand to $50 thousand in the 4^t^h year, the lives saved all fall from 35 to 25. Likewise, injuries prevented fall 300 to 150.

On the other hand, in second alternatives, the expenditure reduced from $1,100 thousand to $700 in 4^t^h year. The saved lives increase from 100 to 125. The prevented injuries remainthe same at 900. So the marginal outcomes of extra expenditure in the second alternative are encouraging. Therefore, the government can adopt the second alternative.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

The state government has passed a regulation requiring that individual sources install filters to capture emissions of inhalable particles. The regulation will require the that installation of the filters start within the upcoming year. The rule is expected to provide improved respiratory health outcomes for the state's citizens. The benefits and costs (shown in the table below) of the rule will be reckoned at the end of each of the next 12 years. The government has analyzed the costs and benefits of the regulation at an annual discount rate of 3%. Determine the annual and total net benefits of the project for each year of the 12 year period, and the net present value of the completed project, as determined in the EPA's current cost-benefit evaluation of the project.. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Benefits 51,278 45,367 52,876 62,448 53,749 39,723 41,804 46,735 44,286 37,873 51,244 47,836 Costs 43,956 32,556 29,864 39,874 36,843 29287 48,536 52,467 36,118 35,122 39,204 41,344

The marginal benefit of being able to emit a ton of sulphur dioxide emissions for twofirms are given by:MB_X = 320 – ( Ex / 3 )MB_Y = 500 – ( Ey / 2 )Note that these marginal benefit figures can be interpreted as marginal cost of abatingemission down to levels Ex and Ey.Government regulators want to reduce total sulfur dioxide emissions to a total of 1200tons.a) If the government imposes the same standard of 600 tons maximum emissions onboth firms what would be the total cost of abatement (calculated as the aggregatedmarginal benefits forgone)?b) If the government distributed 600 tradable pollution permits to each firm whatwould be the final allocation of these permits after the firms trade them? Whatwould be the total cost of abatement in this latter case?

Sandra and Mary live next to each other. Sandra has a dog that she walks every day. Sandra has to walk past Mary's front lawn and her dog always pees on Mary's flowers, which causes them to eventually die. Mary will move in a few months but, until then, she estimates she will spend $100 on flowers to replace the ones that die as a result of the daily visits from Sandra's dog. The only solution to this problem is a $50 fence that can be put around Mary's flowers that will protect them from Sandra's dog. a. What term do economists use for the consequences of Sandra's daily walks in this setting? b. Is it socially optimal to have the fence put around the flowers in this case? Why or why not? c. What does the Coase theorem say about how the social optimum could be achieved? Explain what an agreement between Sandra and Mary would look like if Mary has the right to not be bothered by her neighbour's dog.

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 17, Problem 10E

a)

To determine

To describe: The net present costs of the two programs.

a)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Net present cost in first and second alternatives are $431.35 and $3,174.1 respectively. Total discounted cost of second alternative is greater than the first alternative

Explanation of Solution

Present value of cost of first alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=200(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=200(1 ( 1+r ) n )=200(1 1.1)=200(.909)=181.8

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 181.8

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=200(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=200(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=200(1 1.331)=200(.751)=150.2

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 150.2

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=100(1 1.464)=100(.683)=68.3

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 68.3

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=50(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the fourth year is,

(PV)=50(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=50(1 1.610)=50(.621)=31.05

So, the cost incurred in the fourth year = 31.05

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=181.8+150.2+68.3+31.05=$431.35

Present value of cost of second alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=700(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=700(1 ( 1+.10 ))=700(1 1.1)=700(.909)=636.3

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 636.3

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=1800(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=1800(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=1800(1 1.331)=1800(.751)=1351.8

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 1351.8

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=1,100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=1,100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=1,100(1 1.464)=1,100(.683)=751.3

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 751.3

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=700(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=700(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=700(1 1.610)=700(.621)=434.7

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 434.7

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=636.3+1351.8+751.3+434.7=$3,174.1

Total discounted cost of second alternative is greater than the first alternative.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction: The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

b)

To determine

To describe:

The cost and benefit analysis of two programs.

b)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Based on the cost and benefit analysis second alternative is less as compare to first one.

Explanation of Solution

Discountedprofit from first alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=50(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=50(1 ( 1+.10 ) n )=50(1 1.1)=50(.909)=45.45

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 45.45

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=100(1 1.331)=100(.751)=75.1

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 75.1

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=250(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=250(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=250(1 1.464)=250(.683)=170.75

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 170.75

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the fourth year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=100(1 1.610)=100(.621)=62.1

So, the cost incurred in the fourth year = 62.1

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=45.45+75.1+170.75+62.1=$353.4Thosand

Discounted profit of second alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=150(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=150(1 ( 1+.10 ))=150(1 1.1)=150(.909)=136.35

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 136.35

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=225(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=225(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=225(1 1.331)=225(.751)=168.97

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 168.97

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=250(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=250(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=250(1 1.464)=250(.683)=170.75

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 170.75

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=300(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=300(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=300(1 1.610)=300(.621)=186.3

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 186.3

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=136.35+168.97+170.75+186.3=$662.37Thousand

Benefit-cost ratio of the first alternative

Benefit-cost Ratio=present value of benefitspresent value ofcosts

=353.4431.35=0.819

Benefit-cost ratio of the second alternative

Benefit-cost Ratio=present value of benefitspresent value ofcosts

=662.373174.1=0.208

Based on the cost and benefit analysis second alternative is less as compare to first one.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

c)

To determine

To describe:

The ambiguous choice between the two alternatives and the factors are likely to weigh on the ultimate choice.

c)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Government can adopt the second alternative.

Explanation of Solution

From the costs and the benefits analysis, it is indicated that the government must choose the first alternative instead of second ones. But the further insight into the lives saved and injuries prevented is required. The first alternative shows that expenditure reduces from $1000 thousand to $50 thousand in the 4^t^h year, the lives saved all fall from 35 to 25. Likewise, injuries prevented fall 300 to 150.

On the other hand, in second alternatives, the expenditure reduced from $1,100 thousand to $700 in 4^t^h year. The saved lives increase from 100 to 125. The prevented injuries remainthe same at 900. So the marginal outcomes of extra expenditure in the second alternative are encouraging. Therefore, the government can adopt the second alternative.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 17, Problem 10E

a)

To determine

To describe: The net present costs of the two programs.

a)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Net present cost in first and second alternatives are $431.35 and $3,174.1 respectively. Total discounted cost of second alternative is greater than the first alternative

Explanation of Solution

Present value of cost of first alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=200(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=200(1 ( 1+r ) n )=200(1 1.1)=200(.909)=181.8

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 181.8

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=200(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=200(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=200(1 1.331)=200(.751)=150.2

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 150.2

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=100(1 1.464)=100(.683)=68.3

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 68.3

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=50(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the fourth year is,

(PV)=50(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=50(1 1.610)=50(.621)=31.05

So, the cost incurred in the fourth year = 31.05

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=181.8+150.2+68.3+31.05=$431.35

Present value of cost of second alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=700(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=700(1 ( 1+.10 ))=700(1 1.1)=700(.909)=636.3

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 636.3

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=1800(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=1800(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=1800(1 1.331)=1800(.751)=1351.8

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 1351.8

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=1,100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=1,100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=1,100(1 1.464)=1,100(.683)=751.3

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 751.3

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=700(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=700(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=700(1 1.610)=700(.621)=434.7

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 434.7

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=636.3+1351.8+751.3+434.7=$3,174.1

Total discounted cost of second alternative is greater than the first alternative.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction: The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

b)

To determine

To describe:

The cost and benefit analysis of two programs.

b)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Based on the cost and benefit analysis second alternative is less as compare to first one.

Explanation of Solution

Discountedprofit from first alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=50(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=50(1 ( 1+.10 ) n )=50(1 1.1)=50(.909)=45.45

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 45.45

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=100(1 1.331)=100(.751)=75.1

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 75.1

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=250(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=250(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=250(1 1.464)=250(.683)=170.75

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 170.75

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the fourth year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=100(1 1.610)=100(.621)=62.1

So, the cost incurred in the fourth year = 62.1

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=45.45+75.1+170.75+62.1=$353.4Thosand

Discounted profit of second alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=150(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=150(1 ( 1+.10 ))=150(1 1.1)=150(.909)=136.35

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 136.35

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=225(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=225(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=225(1 1.331)=225(.751)=168.97

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 168.97

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=250(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=250(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=250(1 1.464)=250(.683)=170.75

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 170.75

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=300(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=300(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=300(1 1.610)=300(.621)=186.3

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 186.3

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=136.35+168.97+170.75+186.3=$662.37Thousand

Benefit-cost ratio of the first alternative

Benefit-cost Ratio=present value of benefitspresent value ofcosts

=353.4431.35=0.819

Benefit-cost ratio of the second alternative

Benefit-cost Ratio=present value of benefitspresent value ofcosts

=662.373174.1=0.208

Based on the cost and benefit analysis second alternative is less as compare to first one.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

c)

To determine

To describe:

The ambiguous choice between the two alternatives and the factors are likely to weigh on the ultimate choice.

c)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Government can adopt the second alternative.

Explanation of Solution

From the costs and the benefits analysis, it is indicated that the government must choose the first alternative instead of second ones. But the further insight into the lives saved and injuries prevented is required. The first alternative shows that expenditure reduces from $1000 thousand to $50 thousand in the 4^t^h year, the lives saved all fall from 35 to 25. Likewise, injuries prevented fall 300 to 150.

On the other hand, in second alternatives, the expenditure reduced from $1,100 thousand to $700 in 4^t^h year. The saved lives increase from 100 to 125. The prevented injuries remainthe same at 900. So the marginal outcomes of extra expenditure in the second alternative are encouraging. Therefore, the government can adopt the second alternative.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 17, Problem 10E

a)

To determine

To describe: The net present costs of the two programs.

a)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Net present cost in first and second alternatives are $431.35 and $3,174.1 respectively. Total discounted cost of second alternative is greater than the first alternative

Explanation of Solution

Present value of cost of first alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=200(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=200(1 ( 1+r ) n )=200(1 1.1)=200(.909)=181.8

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 181.8

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=200(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=200(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=200(1 1.331)=200(.751)=150.2

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 150.2

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=100(1 1.464)=100(.683)=68.3

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 68.3

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=50(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the fourth year is,

(PV)=50(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=50(1 1.610)=50(.621)=31.05

So, the cost incurred in the fourth year = 31.05

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=181.8+150.2+68.3+31.05=$431.35

Present value of cost of second alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=700(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=700(1 ( 1+.10 ))=700(1 1.1)=700(.909)=636.3

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 636.3

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=1800(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=1800(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=1800(1 1.331)=1800(.751)=1351.8

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 1351.8

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=1,100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=1,100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=1,100(1 1.464)=1,100(.683)=751.3

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 751.3

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=700(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=700(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=700(1 1.610)=700(.621)=434.7

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 434.7

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=636.3+1351.8+751.3+434.7=$3,174.1

Total discounted cost of second alternative is greater than the first alternative.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction: The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

b)

To determine

To describe:

The cost and benefit analysis of two programs.

b)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Based on the cost and benefit analysis second alternative is less as compare to first one.

Explanation of Solution

Discountedprofit from first alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=50(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=50(1 ( 1+.10 ) n )=50(1 1.1)=50(.909)=45.45

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 45.45

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=100(1 1.331)=100(.751)=75.1

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 75.1

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=250(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=250(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=250(1 1.464)=250(.683)=170.75

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 170.75

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the fourth year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=100(1 1.610)=100(.621)=62.1

So, the cost incurred in the fourth year = 62.1

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=45.45+75.1+170.75+62.1=$353.4Thosand

Discounted profit of second alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=150(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=150(1 ( 1+.10 ))=150(1 1.1)=150(.909)=136.35

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 136.35

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=225(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=225(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=225(1 1.331)=225(.751)=168.97

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 168.97

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=250(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=250(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=250(1 1.464)=250(.683)=170.75

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 170.75

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=300(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=300(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=300(1 1.610)=300(.621)=186.3

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 186.3

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=136.35+168.97+170.75+186.3=$662.37Thousand

Benefit-cost ratio of the first alternative

Benefit-cost Ratio=present value of benefitspresent value ofcosts

=353.4431.35=0.819

Benefit-cost ratio of the second alternative

Benefit-cost Ratio=present value of benefitspresent value ofcosts

=662.373174.1=0.208

Based on the cost and benefit analysis second alternative is less as compare to first one.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

c)

To determine

To describe:

The ambiguous choice between the two alternatives and the factors are likely to weigh on the ultimate choice.

c)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Government can adopt the second alternative.

Explanation of Solution

From the costs and the benefits analysis, it is indicated that the government must choose the first alternative instead of second ones. But the further insight into the lives saved and injuries prevented is required. The first alternative shows that expenditure reduces from $1000 thousand to $50 thousand in the 4^t^h year, the lives saved all fall from 35 to 25. Likewise, injuries prevented fall 300 to 150.

On the other hand, in second alternatives, the expenditure reduced from $1,100 thousand to $700 in 4^t^h year. The saved lives increase from 100 to 125. The prevented injuries remainthe same at 900. So the marginal outcomes of extra expenditure in the second alternative are encouraging. Therefore, the government can adopt the second alternative.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 17, Problem 10E

a)

To determine

To describe: The net present costs of the two programs.

a)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Net present cost in first and second alternatives are $431.35 and $3,174.1 respectively. Total discounted cost of second alternative is greater than the first alternative

Explanation of Solution

Present value of cost of first alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=200(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=200(1 ( 1+r ) n )=200(1 1.1)=200(.909)=181.8

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 181.8

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=200(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=200(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=200(1 1.331)=200(.751)=150.2

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 150.2

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=100(1 1.464)=100(.683)=68.3

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 68.3

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=50(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the fourth year is,

(PV)=50(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=50(1 1.610)=50(.621)=31.05

So, the cost incurred in the fourth year = 31.05

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=181.8+150.2+68.3+31.05=$431.35

Present value of cost of second alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=700(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=700(1 ( 1+.10 ))=700(1 1.1)=700(.909)=636.3

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 636.3

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=1800(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=1800(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=1800(1 1.331)=1800(.751)=1351.8

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 1351.8

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=1,100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=1,100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=1,100(1 1.464)=1,100(.683)=751.3

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 751.3

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=700(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=700(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=700(1 1.610)=700(.621)=434.7

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 434.7

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=636.3+1351.8+751.3+434.7=$3,174.1

Total discounted cost of second alternative is greater than the first alternative.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction: The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

b)

To determine

To describe:

The cost and benefit analysis of two programs.

b)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Based on the cost and benefit analysis second alternative is less as compare to first one.

Explanation of Solution

Discountedprofit from first alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=50(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=50(1 ( 1+.10 ) n )=50(1 1.1)=50(.909)=45.45

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 45.45

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=100(1 1.331)=100(.751)=75.1

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 75.1

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=250(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=250(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=250(1 1.464)=250(.683)=170.75

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 170.75

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the fourth year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=100(1 1.610)=100(.621)=62.1

So, the cost incurred in the fourth year = 62.1

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=45.45+75.1+170.75+62.1=$353.4Thosand

Discounted profit of second alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=150(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=150(1 ( 1+.10 ))=150(1 1.1)=150(.909)=136.35

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 136.35

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=225(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=225(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=225(1 1.331)=225(.751)=168.97

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 168.97

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=250(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=250(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=250(1 1.464)=250(.683)=170.75

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 170.75

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=300(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=300(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=300(1 1.610)=300(.621)=186.3

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 186.3

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=136.35+168.97+170.75+186.3=$662.37Thousand

Benefit-cost ratio of the first alternative

Benefit-cost Ratio=present value of benefitspresent value ofcosts

=353.4431.35=0.819

Benefit-cost ratio of the second alternative

Benefit-cost Ratio=present value of benefitspresent value ofcosts

=662.373174.1=0.208

Based on the cost and benefit analysis second alternative is less as compare to first one.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

c)

To determine

To describe:

The ambiguous choice between the two alternatives and the factors are likely to weigh on the ultimate choice.

c)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Government can adopt the second alternative.

Explanation of Solution

From the costs and the benefits analysis, it is indicated that the government must choose the first alternative instead of second ones. But the further insight into the lives saved and injuries prevented is required. The first alternative shows that expenditure reduces from $1000 thousand to $50 thousand in the 4^t^h year, the lives saved all fall from 35 to 25. Likewise, injuries prevented fall 300 to 150.

On the other hand, in second alternatives, the expenditure reduced from $1,100 thousand to $700 in 4^t^h year. The saved lives increase from 100 to 125. The prevented injuries remainthe same at 900. So the marginal outcomes of extra expenditure in the second alternative are encouraging. Therefore, the government can adopt the second alternative.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

Answer 6

Chapter 17, Problem 10E

a)

To determine

To describe: The net present costs of the two programs.

a)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Net present cost in first and second alternatives are $431.35 and $3,174.1 respectively. Total discounted cost of second alternative is greater than the first alternative

Explanation of Solution

Present value of cost of first alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=200(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=200(1 ( 1+r ) n )=200(1 1.1)=200(.909)=181.8

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 181.8

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=200(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=200(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=200(1 1.331)=200(.751)=150.2

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 150.2

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=100(1 1.464)=100(.683)=68.3

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 68.3

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=50(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the fourth year is,

(PV)=50(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=50(1 1.610)=50(.621)=31.05

So, the cost incurred in the fourth year = 31.05

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=181.8+150.2+68.3+31.05=$431.35

Present value of cost of second alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=700(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=700(1 ( 1+.10 ))=700(1 1.1)=700(.909)=636.3

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 636.3

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=1800(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=1800(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=1800(1 1.331)=1800(.751)=1351.8

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 1351.8

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=1,100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=1,100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=1,100(1 1.464)=1,100(.683)=751.3

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 751.3

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=700(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=700(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=700(1 1.610)=700(.621)=434.7

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 434.7

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=636.3+1351.8+751.3+434.7=$3,174.1

Total discounted cost of second alternative is greater than the first alternative.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction: The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

Answer 7

Chapter 17, Problem 10E

a)

To determine

To describe: The net present costs of the two programs.

Answer 8

a)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Net present cost in first and second alternatives are $431.35 and $3,174.1 respectively. Total discounted cost of second alternative is greater than the first alternative

Answer 9

a)

Expert Solution

Answer 10

a)

Expert Solution

Answer 11

Expert Solution

Answer 12

Explanation of Solution

Present value of cost of first alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=200(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=200(1 ( 1+r ) n )=200(1 1.1)=200(.909)=181.8

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 181.8

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=200(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=200(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=200(1 1.331)=200(.751)=150.2

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 150.2

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=100(1 1.464)=100(.683)=68.3

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 68.3

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=50(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of years

Preset value in the fourth year is,

(PV)=50(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=50(1 1.610)=50(.621)=31.05

So, the cost incurred in the fourth year = 31.05

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=181.8+150.2+68.3+31.05=$431.35

Present value of cost of second alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=700(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=700(1 ( 1+.10 ))=700(1 1.1)=700(.909)=636.3

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 636.3

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=1800(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=1800(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=1800(1 1.331)=1800(.751)=1351.8

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 1351.8

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=1,100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=1,100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=1,100(1 1.464)=1,100(.683)=751.3

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 751.3

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=700(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=700(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=700(1 1.610)=700(.621)=434.7

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 434.7

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=636.3+1351.8+751.3+434.7=$3,174.1

Total discounted cost of second alternative is greater than the first alternative.

Answer 13

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction: The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

Answer 14

b)

To determine

To describe:

The cost and benefit analysis of two programs.

b)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Based on the cost and benefit analysis second alternative is less as compare to first one.

Explanation of Solution

Discountedprofit from first alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=50(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=50(1 ( 1+.10 ) n )=50(1 1.1)=50(.909)=45.45

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 45.45

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=100(1 1.331)=100(.751)=75.1

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 75.1

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=250(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=250(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=250(1 1.464)=250(.683)=170.75

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 170.75

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the fourth year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=100(1 1.610)=100(.621)=62.1

So, the cost incurred in the fourth year = 62.1

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=45.45+75.1+170.75+62.1=$353.4Thosand

Discounted profit of second alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=150(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=150(1 ( 1+.10 ))=150(1 1.1)=150(.909)=136.35

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 136.35

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=225(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=225(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=225(1 1.331)=225(.751)=168.97

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 168.97

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=250(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=250(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=250(1 1.464)=250(.683)=170.75

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 170.75

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=300(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=300(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=300(1 1.610)=300(.621)=186.3

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 186.3

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=136.35+168.97+170.75+186.3=$662.37Thousand

Benefit-cost ratio of the first alternative

Benefit-cost Ratio=present value of benefitspresent value ofcosts

=353.4431.35=0.819

Benefit-cost ratio of the second alternative

Benefit-cost Ratio=present value of benefitspresent value ofcosts

=662.373174.1=0.208

Based on the cost and benefit analysis second alternative is less as compare to first one.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

Answer 15

b)

To determine

To describe:

The cost and benefit analysis of two programs.

Answer 16

b)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Based on the cost and benefit analysis second alternative is less as compare to first one.

Answer 17

b)

Expert Solution

Answer 18

b)

Expert Solution

Answer 19

Expert Solution

Answer 20

Explanation of Solution

Discountedprofit from first alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=50(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=50(1 ( 1+.10 ) n )=50(1 1.1)=50(.909)=45.45

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 45.45

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=100(1 1.331)=100(.751)=75.1

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 75.1

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=250(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=250(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=250(1 1.464)=250(.683)=170.75

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 170.75

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=100(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the fourth year is,

(PV)=100(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=100(1 1.610)=100(.621)=62.1

So, the cost incurred in the fourth year = 62.1

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=45.45+75.1+170.75+62.1=$353.4Thosand

Discounted profit of second alternative,

Present value of cost incurred in first year (PV)=150(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the first year is,

(PV)=150(1 ( 1+.10 ))=150(1 1.1)=150(.909)=136.35

So, the cost incurred in the first year = 136.35

Present value of cost incurred in second year (PV)=225(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=225(1 ( 1+.10 ) 2 )=225(1 1.331)=225(.751)=168.97

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 168.97

Present value of cost incurred in third year (PV)=250(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the third year is,

(PV)=250(1 ( 1+.10 ) 3 )=250(1 1.464)=250(.683)=170.75

So, the cost incurred in the third year = 170.75

Present value of cost incurred in fourth year (PV)=300(1 ( 1+r )n)

" r " is the discount rate

" n " is the number of year

Preset value in the second year is,

(PV)=300(1 ( 1+.10 ) 4 )=300(1 1.610)=300(.621)=186.3

So, the cost incurred in the second year = 186.3

TotalDicountedRate=[DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfFirstYear+DiscountedCostOfThrirdYear+DiscountedCostOfFourthYear]=136.35+168.97+170.75+186.3=$662.37Thousand

Benefit-cost ratio of the first alternative

Benefit-cost Ratio=present value of benefitspresent value ofcosts

=353.4431.35=0.819

Benefit-cost ratio of the second alternative

Benefit-cost Ratio=present value of benefitspresent value ofcosts

=662.373174.1=0.208

Based on the cost and benefit analysis second alternative is less as compare to first one.

Answer 21

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

Answer 22

c)

To determine

To describe:

The ambiguous choice between the two alternatives and the factors are likely to weigh on the ultimate choice.

c)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Government can adopt the second alternative.

Explanation of Solution

From the costs and the benefits analysis, it is indicated that the government must choose the first alternative instead of second ones. But the further insight into the lives saved and injuries prevented is required. The first alternative shows that expenditure reduces from $1000 thousand to $50 thousand in the 4^t^h year, the lives saved all fall from 35 to 25. Likewise, injuries prevented fall 300 to 150.

On the other hand, in second alternatives, the expenditure reduced from $1,100 thousand to $700 in 4^t^h year. The saved lives increase from 100 to 125. The prevented injuries remainthe same at 900. So the marginal outcomes of extra expenditure in the second alternative are encouraging. Therefore, the government can adopt the second alternative.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.

Answer 23

c)

To determine

To describe:

The ambiguous choice between the two alternatives and the factors are likely to weigh on the ultimate choice.

Answer 24

c)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10E

Government can adopt the second alternative.

Answer 25

c)

Expert Solution

Answer 26

c)

Expert Solution

Answer 27

Expert Solution

Answer 28

Explanation of Solution

From the costs and the benefits analysis, it is indicated that the government must choose the first alternative instead of second ones. But the further insight into the lives saved and injuries prevented is required. The first alternative shows that expenditure reduces from $1000 thousand to $50 thousand in the 4^t^h year, the lives saved all fall from 35 to 25. Likewise, injuries prevented fall 300 to 150.

On the other hand, in second alternatives, the expenditure reduced from $1,100 thousand to $700 in 4^t^h year. The saved lives increase from 100 to 125. The prevented injuries remainthe same at 900. So the marginal outcomes of extra expenditure in the second alternative are encouraging. Therefore, the government can adopt the second alternative.

Answer 29

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:

The discount rate is the rate at which a discounted cash flow (DCF) model will measure the real value of potential cash flows. This helps to assess whether future cash flows from a project or investment are more than the investment required to fund the existing project or amount.