2nd Edition

ISBN: 9781947172364

Author: Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher: OpenStax

Textbook Question

Chapter 10, Problem 16CTQ

Would you rather have efficiency or variety? That is, one opportunity cost of the variety of products we have is that each product costs more per unit than if there were only one kind of product of a given type, like shoes. Perhaps a better question is, “What is the right amount of variety? Can there be too many varieties of shoes, for example?”

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Chapter 10, Problem 15CTQ

Chapter 10, Problem 17CTQ

Students have asked these similar questions

Inferior goods are affordable substitutes for more expensive goods. Which of the following is an example of someone purchasing an inferior good? Tom saved his money for an entire year so that he could buy the nicest car on the lot. Susan decided to buy her favorite pasta, rather than the store-brand pasta that she usually purchases. Sam had to stay within his budget, so he decided to buy generic toaster pastries instead of his favorite brand-name pastries. Jennifer earned a bonus at work, so she decided to go out to dinner at a fancy restaurant.

You may have observed that items such as different brands of aspirin, tomato sauce, or gasoline are typically priced the same as each other. This is particularly true when consumers can find these goods in close proximity to each other. For example, prices are often the same at gas stations that are on opposite sides of the street. Prices are also generally the same for products next to each other on the same grocery store shelf. Choose the correct fill in the blank. The aforementioned examples are goods that are likely to be substitutes or complements You would expect the value of the cross-price elasticity to be insignificant, small, or large because the opportunity cost of getting information on price is low.

Sven makes rocking chairs for a cost of $75 each, and he sells the rocking chairs for a market price of $130 each. Deidre is willing to pay $200 for a rocking chair. However, the government believes that rocking chair manufacturers should receive more money, and set the lowest legal price rocking chairs can be sold for at $250. At the market price, Sven is willing to sell a rocking chair to Deidre, and Deidre is willing to buy a rocking chair from Sven. Unfortunately, with the new legal minimum, Sven and Deidre cannot trade with one another, and miss out on additional gains from trade. Which of the effects of a price control best fits the scenario above? O Deadweight Loss Reduction in Quality O Misallocation of Resources Wasteful Increase in Quality