Which of the following would be a reason why incumbents may have an absolute cost advantage over entrants? Incumbents may have plants in the most desirable locations. O b. Incumbents' output may be greater. O c. Incumbents may be able to offer lower prices than entrants. d. Entrants face an opportunity cost of using scarce

Which of the following would be a reason why incumbents may have an absolute cost advantage over entrants? Incumbents may have plants in the most desirable locations. O b. Incumbents' output may be greater. O c. Incumbents may be able to offer lower prices than entrants. d. Entrants face an opportunity cost of using scarce

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter9: Monopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 31P: Return to Figure 9.2. Suppose P0 is 10 and P1 is 11. Suppose a new firm with the same LRAC curve as...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

answer the ff: Suppose that each company cancharge either a high price for tickets or a low price. Ifone company charges $300, it earns low profit if theother company also charges $300 and high profit ifthe other company charges $600. On the other hand,if the company charges $600, it earns very low profit ifthe other company charges $300 and medium profitif the other company also charges $600.a. Draw the decision box for this game.b. What is the Nash equilibrium in this game?Explain.c. Is there an outcome that would be better than theNash equilibrium for both airlines? How could itbe achieved? Who would lose if it were achieved?
. When Chinese automakers began exporting cars, rather thanfocusing on developed nations in the West, they shippedautos to emerging markets in countries such as Algeria, Russia,Chile, and South Africa. In these markets, even used vehiclesfrom multinational manufacturers are relatively scarce—andrelatively expensive. The Chinese automakers, who prioritizelow cost rather than design or even safety, applied a penetration-pricing strategy. A woman in Santiago, Chile, who boughta new Chery S21 explained, “The price factor is fairly decisive.I paid $5,500 new and full. Toyota with similar features costsaround $12,000.” Why do you think Chinese automakerschose that pricing strategy? Do you think it was successful?As Chinese regulators pressure these manufacturers to maketheir cars safer, do you think they will be able to keep theirprices low compared with those of the international automakers? Why or why not?26
Suppoe at the curent level of production a frmts marginal revenue equalo $1,000, their average total costs curently equal $1,200, and their marginal cost equals S00, Tis firm OA should expand output because their evenue will increase by $1.000, OB. should not expand output because their profit will decrease by $200. OC should expand output because their profit will increase by $100 OD. There is not information given to determine whether this firm should expand output or not
TPrice - Marginal Cost 40 30 20 Demand 100 150 200 Quaxtity Marginal Revenue 200 units of output and a price of $20 per unit 100 units of output and a price of $20 per unit O 200 units of output and a price of $40 per unit O 100 units of output and a price of $40 per unit O 150 units of output and a price of $30 per unit
Kate and Alice are small-town ready-mix concrete duopolints. The market demand tunction is o- 20,000 - 200Pwhere Pis the price of a cubic yard of concrete and Ois the number of cubic yards demanded per year. Marginal cost is sa0 per cubic yard. Suppose Kate onters the market first and chooses her output belore Alice. What is the difference in Alice's profit when Kata enters the market tirst, compared to when they simultanecusly select ther outputa? When Kate entors the markat first, Alice's profit is $3,888.a0 lower. O When Kate enters the market fest, Alice's profit is 513,333.33 lower. O When Kate enters the market first, Alice's profit is $5,000 lower. O When Kate onters the market first, Alice's proft is $1.111.11 higher,
Consi der Hhe fallowing » The inverse femand function is givan by p= 30-@ Cournet medel. where Q = E,+ * Firm 13 marginal cost is $6lei=6). Fivm 2 uses a nem techaulagy There is no that it's marginal cost is $3 (6=3). fixed cort So The fwo fims chooce thair and Compete only Jame). Answer the follming puestions. O Derive Firm 1 amd Firm 2% vation furtions reupertivaly. o Solve Hhe Harh equilibrium ( ", q") O What is He equilibrinm level for eah firm. quenti tias simultaneculy (So it's a one- shot simultaneaus once price and what is Hhe profit Suppore there is Iim 2. Wlhat is the highert price that Firm I is willing to paj for this new o Mow let's chauge the setup from Coumet campetition to Bertrand Competitin, while maintaining all efther aJAump tins. What is He equilibium price? O Suppon the fwe finms engage in Betrand (ompetition What is the hijhut price that Fim 1 o milling for He new feihnly? * market for the teihue lagy uped by to
It is less important for firms that sell commodities to have a competitive advantage. O a. True, a competitive advantage is not useful for commodity firms because they are usually a monopoly with no competitors O b. True, the most important factor for commodity firms is lower prices O c. False O d. True, the most important factor for commodity firms is lower costs O e. True, the most important factors for commodity firms are both lower costs and lower prices
ం వయడు Firms in Marçaa cost =o for Goth • FicmsAroduce Fir Twe firms 20 bertrand compotition for both diffrencided poduts, oms Sunction have the fallowing inverse denand शि= | -01- 203 pz=1-92-5 a Defue repried 6 Denve Rertrand equilbba Bertrand reaction functio) and diagremadticalde 5) madirall Deుల and equilubi gauntitier,pricer Arofits.
Next Question Consider the network scheduling profit matrix Can the Pareto Critenon hep me networks sette on a single equibrum? Explain The Pareto Criterion Ne O A cannot help the networks sette on a singlo equibrum because the Wednesday Thursday networks cannot communicate OB. can help the networks settle on a single equibrum because the networks have dominant strateges Wednesday OC. cannot help the networks settie on a singie equilbnum because no Nash equilibria is better for both networks 40 Nebok 2 O D. can help the networks settle on a single equibrium because one Nash equilibrium has the highest joint payoffs O E. cannot help the networks settle on a single equilbrum because the networks must schedule simultaneously Thursdey
F5 Price, Cost 200 6 120 40 0 Figure 1 Module....pptx -- ww 9 F6 40 MacBook Pro This question is based on the figure above, which describes cost and demand conditions in the widget industry. Assume that costs functions to not vary according to market structure (competition vs. monopoly, for example). The following questions are based on the diagram above: & 7 « P= 200-20 F7 MR 80 ▶11 tv 100 F8 MC = ATC Units per day www. F9 A ) F10 F11 +
Return to Figure 9.2. Suppose P0 is 10 and P1 is 11. Suppose a new firm with the same LRAC curve as the incumbent tries to bleak into the market by selling 4,000 units of output. Estimate from the graph what the new firms average cost of producing output would be. If the incumbent continues. to produce 6,000 units, how much output would the two films supply to the market? Estimate what would happen to the market price as a result of the supply of both the incumbent firm and the new entrant. Approximately how much profit would each firm earn? Figure 9.2 Economics of Scale and Natural Monoploy
Would you rather have efficiency or variety? That is, one opportunity cost of the variety of products we have is that each product costs more per unit than if there were only one kind of product of a given type, like shoes. Perhaps a better question is, What is the right amount of variety? Can there be too many varieties of shoes, for example?