Which of the following is/are the advantage(s) of increasing the disk block size in a file system? (Choose all correct answers.) Group of answer choices A. Decreased disk block transfer delay B. Increased disk utilization C. Increased maximum file size for indexed allocation D. Increased disk read and write throughput

Which of the following is/are the advantage(s) of increasing the disk block size in a file system? (Choose all correct answers.) Group of answer choices A. Decreased disk block transfer delay B. Increased disk utilization C. Increased maximum file size for indexed allocation D. Increased disk read and write throughput

EBK JAVA PROGRAMMING

9th Edition

ISBN:9781337671385

Author:FARRELL

Publisher:FARRELL

Chapter13: File Input And Output

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3RQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

What is the maximum file size supported by a file system with 16 direct blocks,single,double,and triple indirection?the block size is 1k bytes.Disk block numbers can be stored in 4 bytes? give the answer in detail
what is the maximum file size suported by a file system with 12 direct blocks,single,double, and triple indirection? The block size is 1k bytes. Disk block numbers cant be stored in 4 bytes. (describe the detailed calculation process)
Operating systems make an effort to retain subsequent disk blocks in the same position after reading a file from a given block. Why are magnetic disks so important? Are solid-state drives (SSDs) still recommended, or have they become obsolete? There has always been consensus that solid-state drives (SSDs) are the best option for archival data storage. There must be an explanation for this.
What is the maximum file size supported by a file system with 12 direct blocks, single, double, and triple indirection? The block size is 4K bytes. Disk block numbers can be stored in 4 bytes. (Describe the detailed calculation process subject = operating system
Consecutive blocks of a file should be placed on the same disk block by operating systems. For what reason is it so critical to do so with magnetic disks?
Operating systems make an effort to maintain the position of consecutive blocks on the disk in the event that a file is read from a disk block. What exactly are the benefits of using magnetic disks? Should we continue to encourage using SSDs, or have we reached a point where this advice is no longer relevant? Solid-state drives (SSDs) have been held in high regard as a better storage medium for some time. There is unquestionably a rationale underlying all of this activity.
I'm wondering what sort of file access pattern would be the most appropriate for chained file allocation on disk.
It is the operating system's responsibility to ensure that the blocks of a file are stored on the disk in the proper sequence when a file is opened. What is it about magnetic disks that makes this such an important consideration? Would it make a difference if solid-state drives (SSDs) were used instead, or would it be a non-issue? What is the reason behind this?
Discuss the techniques for allocating file blocks on disk. What are different types of file organization?
In general, what are the two types of files that exist? What exactly is the difference between these two file types?
What are the two most common file types in use today? Is there a distinction between these two types of files?
When a file is read from a disk block, operating systems attempt to keep succeeding blocks in the same location. What is the significance of magnetic disks? Does the recommendation to use SSDs still hold or has it been rendered obsolete? SSDs have long been considered a superior storage medium. Surely, there must be a reason behind this.