The utility maximization condition for the consumer is ○ MRS₁,c = w ○ MRSI,C = w MRS₁,c = 1 ○ MRS₁,c= 4 In Choose the correct one. This problem considers the decisions of a consumer whose preferences are given by u(C,1)=C+4 lnl, in which C' is the quantity of consumption and I is the quantity of leisure. The consumer faces two constraints. The time constraint is given by 1 + N³ = 1 with NS as the time spent working (or the labor supply). The main advantage of working is the wages consumers receive. Consumers take wages as given (outside of their control) and obtain wage income equal to wN³. The budget constraint is C wNsT, with π as real dividend income and T as the real = lump-sum taxes paid to government.

Question You are the manager of a firm and you are required to optimize the Cobb Douglas function given the following parameters. The maximum amount of money available is$1600 where the price of K = 12 and the price of L=6. That is PK=12 and PL=6. The function is given as q=K0.4+L0.6. What is the constraint equation? a. none of the above b. 12K - 6L = 1600 c. 12K/6L = 1600 d. 12K+6L=1600

An individual values both consumption and leisure. Suppose the individual has 1600 hours per week they can allocate between leisure and work. IF the individual works, they make a wage of $25 per hour. The individual's utility function is given as a function of leisure time, L and consumption, c: U(L, c) = L^(1/2)c ^ (1/2) a) Draw the individual's budget constraint for leisure and consumption. b) How much leisure time will the individual have when utility maximizing? c) Consider a Universal Basic Income policy like the one proposed by Andrew Yang that would give all individuals a lump -sum, unconditional cash transfer of $1,000 each month. How much leisure time will the individual have when utility maximizing with the cash transfer? d) Now suppose, instead of a cash transfer, a minimum wage of $40 per hour is implemented. How much leisure time will the individual have when utility maximizing with the cash transfer? e) What change in leisure time can be attributed to the substitution…

In a standard consumer optimization problem in microeconomics, a consumer purchases any pair of goods untilU1U2=p1p2(?), at an interior solution, where Ux is the marginal utility of good x for the consumer and px is the price of good x, where x={1,2}. What is the corresponding optimality condition for a worker-consumer in his labour-leisure optimization problem and why is it just a variation on the standard optimality condition (?)?

Ivan faces a labor supply decision. His well-behaved preferences over the two goods "hours of leisure' L and 'consumption' c can be represented by u= 4(L)1/2 +c. He has no non-labor income and can choose how many hours to work at the wage rate u per hour. The price per unit of consumption is p, and his available free time is T hours .a)Sketch Ivan's budget set, with axes, intercepts, and slope labeled (these will depend on the parameters w, p, and T) .b)Use the tangency method to find Ivan's demand functions for leisure and consumption (as functions of u, p. and T) .c) Let's think about Ivan's "time expansion path" (that is, the analog of the income expansion path a.k.a. income-consumption loci but for changes in T). Sketch it and explain why it has this shape. with reference to Ivan's demand functions.d) (3 points) In terms of parameters from the model, what is the most that Ivan would be willing to pay to have an extra hour of free time (that is, to increase T by 1)? Why?

This problem considers the decisions of a consumer whose preferences are given by u(C,1)=C+4 lnl, in which C' is the quantity of consumption and I is the quantity of leisure. The consumer faces two constraints. The time constraint is given by 1 + N³ = 1 with NS as the time spent working (or the labor supply). The main advantage of working is the wages consumers receive. Consumers take wages as given (outside of their control) and obtain wage income equal to wN³. The budget constraint is C wNsT, with π as real dividend income and T as the real = lump-sum taxes paid to government.

An individual’s utility function is given by where is the amount of leisure measured in hours per week and is income earned measured in cedis per week.  Determine the value of the marginal utilities, when = 138 and = 500. Hence estimate the change in utility if the individual works for an extra hour, which increases earned income by GH¢15 per week. Does the law of diminishing utility hold for this function?

Ivan faces a labor supply decision. His well-behaved preferences over the two goods "hours of leisure' L and 'consumption' c can be represented by u= 4(L)1/2 +c. He has no non-labor income and can choose how many hours to work at the wage rate u per hour. The price per unit of consumption is p, and his available free time is T hours .a)  Sketch Ivan's budget set, with axes, intercepts, and slope labeled (these will depend on the parameters w, p, and T) .b)  Use the tangency method to find Ivan's demand functions for leisure and consumption (as functions of u, p. and T) .c)  Let's think about Ivan's "time expansion path" (that is, the analog of the income expansion path a.k.a. income-consumption loci but for changes in T). Sketch it and explain why it has this shape. with reference to Ivan's demand functions.d)  In terms of parameters from the model, what is the most that Ivan would be willing to pay to have an extra hour of free time (that is, to increase T by 1)? Why?

Winona has 80 hours to divide between leisure and labor. Her utility function is u(r,c) = f(r) + c, when r represents hours of leisure,c represents dollars of consumption, and f is strictly concave. Winona’s wage is w0= $15/hr. initially, then it rises to w1= $20/hr. (i) Explain what happens to Winona’s labor supply when the wage rises,and why. (ii) Explain how the answer to (i) would change if Winona were to win a lottery.

A consumer has preferences over bundles of leisure (L) and consumption (z) respresented by the utility function u(L, r) = La and has 24 hours in the day to divide between work and lesiure. This consumer has sorme positive amount of nonwork income per day (m > 0) and is able to select how many hours they wish to work at some positive wage per hour (w > 0). Find the consumer's reservation wage as a function of m: this is the lowest wage at which the consumer will work positive hours. Equivalently, it is the highest wage at which the consumer will work zero hours. (Hint: this is all about the MRS when working zero hours.)