asnwer a and b only. The domain for this problem is some unspecified collection of numbers. Consider the predicateP(x, y) = "x is greater than y."(a) Translate the following statement into predicate logic.Every number has a number that is greater than it.(vx)(3)P(x, y)(x)(V)(x,x)(3x)(v)P(x,x)(V)(3)(x,x)(3x)(3y)P(y,x)X(b) Negate your expression from part (a), and simplify it so that no quantifier or connective lies within the scope of a negation.(3x)(3)(-P(y, x))((((, x))(3x)(V)(-P(x, y))(3x)(V)(Py, x))(vx)(3)(~P(y, x))X(c) Translate your expression from part (b) into understandable English. Don't use variables in your English translation.O All numbers have a number that they are less than or equal to.There is a number that has a number that it is less than or equal to.O There is a number that all numbers are greater than or equal to.There is a number that all numbers are less than or equal to.O All numbers are less than or equal to all numbers.

Answer: Given P(x, y)="x is greater than y"; we need to write the translated predicated

The domain for this problem is some unspecified collection of numbers. Consider the predicate P(x, y) = "x is greater than y." (a) Translate the following statement into predicate logic. Every number has a number that is greater than it. (x)(3)(x, y) (((x) (3x)(V)(x,x) (x)(3)(y,x) (3x)(3y)P(y,x) X (b) Negate your expression from part (a), and simplify it so that no quantifier or connective lies within the scope of a neg. (3x)(3)(~P(y, x)) (((()) (3))(-P(x, y)) ((((, x)) (x)(3)(~P(x, x)) X (c) Translate your expression from part (b) into understandable English. Don't use variables in your English translation. O All numbers have a number that they are less than or equal to. O There is a number that has a number that it is less than or equal to. O There is a number that all numbers are greater than or equal to. There is a number that all numbers are less than or equal to. O All numbers are less than or equal to all numbers.

The domain for this problem is some unspecified collection of numbers. Consider the predicate P(x, y) = "x is greater than y." (a) Translate the following statement into predicate logic. Every number has a number that is greater than it. (x)(3)(x, y) (((x) (3x)(V)(x,x) (x)(3)(y,x) (3x)(3y)P(y,x) X (b) Negate your expression from part (a), and simplify it so that no quantifier or connective lies within the scope of a neg. (3x)(3)(~P(y, x)) (((()) (3))(-P(x, y)) ((((, x)) (x)(3)(~P(x, x)) X (c) Translate your expression from part (b) into understandable English. Don't use variables in your English translation. O All numbers have a number that they are less than or equal to. O There is a number that has a number that it is less than or equal to. O There is a number that all numbers are greater than or equal to. There is a number that all numbers are less than or equal to. O All numbers are less than or equal to all numbers.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

13. p(x): x is intelligent q(x): x reads book r(x): x is a student in your class Find the correct English translation for the following logical expression: ∀x(r(x)→(p(x) Λ q(x)) a. None b. There is an intelligent student in your class who reads book c. Every student in your class is intelligent and reads book d. All student in your class is intelligent and doesn't read book
Using the predicate symbols shown and the appropriate quantifiers, write each English language statement as a predicate wff. (The domain is the whole world.) D(x): x is a day S(x): x is sunny R(x): x is rainy M: Monday T: Tuesday Some days are not rainy. which one from this group of answes is the right one a. (∀x)(D(x) ∧ [R(x)]') b. (∀x)(D(x) → [R(x)]') c. (∃x)(D(x) → [R(x)]') d. (∃x)(D(x) ∧ [R(x)]')
Using the predicate symbols shown and the appropriate quantifiers, write each English language statement as a predicate wff. (The domain is the whole world.) D(x): x is a day S(x): x is sunny R(x): x is rainy M: Monday T: Tuesday All days are sunny. which of these answers are right? a. (∀x)[D(x) ∧ S(x)] b. (∀x)[D(x) → S(x)] c. (∃x)[D(x) ∧ S(x)] d. (∃x)[D(x) → S(x)
Below are some predicates and their corresponding statements: p(x): x is a student in your class q(x): x has taken a course in logic programming Here, the domain for quantifiers consists of all people. Choose the correct proposition for the sentence: All student in your class has not taken a course in logic programming. a. ∀x¬(P(x) → Q(x)) b. ∀x(P(x) → ¬Q(x) c. ¬∀x (P(x) → Q(x)) d. ¬∃x(P(x) ∧ Q(x))
Objective: The objective of this discussion is to be aware of the field of logic. Problem Statement: Consider the statement: "There is a person x who is a student in CSEN 5303 and has visited Mexico" Explain why the answer cannot be 3r (S(x)→ M(x)).
the result after applying a predicate P to a value of subject x is the
Let B(x) be the statement "X is a ball", R(x) be the statement "X is round and let S(x) be the statements "X is a soccer ball" where the domain consists of the whole world. Write the following sentences using predicates and qunitifiers: d) Every soccer ball is round e) A soccer ball is roundUser A for the universal quantifier symbol and E for the existential quantifier symbol
Predicates S(x): x is a studentD(x): x is a petH(x): x is a homeT(x, y): x is owned by y (y owns x)E(x, y): x eats at yK(x, y): x knows yL(x, y): x and y play together [Q2: Translate sentence to logic] Some pet plays with every student. Answer: [Q3: Translate sentence to logic] If a pet plays with a student at some home, then it eats at this home. Answer: [Q4: Translate formula to English] ∀x(S(x) → ∃y(D(x) ∧ L(x,y))) Answer: [Q5: Invent a Problem ] Answer:
Rewrite the following statement so that negations appear only within predicates (that is, no negation is outside a quantifier or an expression involving logical connectives) ¬∀x ((∀y∃z P(x, y, z)) ⊕ (∀z∀y (R(x, y, z) ∨ S(z, y)))).
1. Teachers in the Middle Ages supposedly tested the real-time propositional logic ability of a student via a technique known as an obligato game. In an obligato game, a number of rounds is set and in each round the teacher gives the student successive assertions that the student must either accept or reject as they are given. When the student accepts an assertion, it is added as a commitment; when the student rejects an assertion its negation is added as a commitment. The student passes the test if the consistency of all commitments is maintained throughout the test. a.) Suppose that in a three-round obligato game, the teacher first gives the student the proposition p → q, then the proposition ¬(p ∨ r) ∨ q, and finally the proposition q. For which of the eight possible sequences of three answers will the student pass the test? b.) Explain why every obligato game has a winning strategy.
Mathematical Logic. First-order or predicate logic. For each of the following relations, give a formula that defines it in (N;+,∙). The language has equality and has the parameters ∀,+ and ∙. a) {0} b) {1} c) {〈m,n〉| n is the successor of m in N} d) {〈m,n〉| n<n in N} Please be as clear as possible. Thank you.
Let K (x, y) be the statement "x knows y", where the universe of discourse for both x and y is the set of all people. (Assume it is possible for x to know y while y does not know x, and hence K(x, y) and K(y,x) are different statements.) Translate the sentence "there are two distinct persons who know each other, and no one else" into First Order Logic. 2.