Researchers examining decomposition rate constants: k = 0.058-0.61 d1 for the soft tissues of fish and waterfowl; and k 0.03-0.05 d1 for aquatic plants. Decomposition was measured under similar environmental conditions. (A) Based on the estimated rate constants, which type of material-animal (i.e. fish, waterfowl) or plant (i.e. aquatic plants)-decomposes faster? (B) What is a likely explanation for this pattern? E.g., how would C:N compare between the two materials? [2-3 sentences]
Researchers examining decomposition rate constants: k = 0.058-0.61 d1 for the soft tissues of fish and waterfowl; and k 0.03-0.05 d1 for aquatic plants. Decomposition was measured under similar environmental conditions. (A) Based on the estimated rate constants, which type of material-animal (i.e. fish, waterfowl) or plant (i.e. aquatic plants)-decomposes faster? (B) What is a likely explanation for this pattern? E.g., how would C:N compare between the two materials? [2-3 sentences]
Chapter4: Metric/international (si) System
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 2.6P
Related questions
Question
![Researchers examining decomposition in a freshwater marsh estimated the tollowing
decomposition rate constants: k 0.058-0.61 d1 for the soft tissues of fish and
waterfowl; and k = 0.03-0.05 d for aquatic plants. Decomposition was measured
under similar environmental conditions.
%3D
%3D
(A) Based on the estimated rate constants, which type of material-animal (i.e. fish,
waterfowl) or plant (i.e. aquatic plants)-decomposes faster?
(B) What is a likely explanation for this pattern? E.g., how would C:N compare
between the two materials? [2-3 sentences]](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Fcd617b0d-2424-4a34-8571-67fe540a0678%2F120ef26a-4f99-4a43-b976-57a800934200%2F0rag4r7_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Researchers examining decomposition in a freshwater marsh estimated the tollowing
decomposition rate constants: k 0.058-0.61 d1 for the soft tissues of fish and
waterfowl; and k = 0.03-0.05 d for aquatic plants. Decomposition was measured
under similar environmental conditions.
%3D
%3D
(A) Based on the estimated rate constants, which type of material-animal (i.e. fish,
waterfowl) or plant (i.e. aquatic plants)-decomposes faster?
(B) What is a likely explanation for this pattern? E.g., how would C:N compare
between the two materials? [2-3 sentences]
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you