Objective: Using the equilibrium constant and reaction quotient expressions, and the ICEtable to calculate concentrations of various chemical species in the reaction.1. The water gas shift reaction (WGSR) has a K. = 2.7 at a given temperature:CO(g) + H₂O(g) — CO₂(g) + H₂(g)0.13 mol of CO, 0.56 mol of H₂O, 0.62 mol of CO2, and 0.43 mol of H₂ are placed in anevacuated 2.0 L flask.a. Prove or disprove that this is an equilibrium mixture, using the reaction quotient.b. Write an ICE (initial, change, equilibrium) table for the conditions given. Fill in the"change" line, consistent with your answer to part a.c. Solve the ICE table and write the equilibrium concentrations for all four chemicalspecies.d. The simplifying assumption that the change in concentration of the reactants isSMALL (and therefore negligible to the calculation) compared to the initial concentrationof the reactants. Is this assumption justified in this reaction and these conditions? Do alittle math to prove your point.

The reaction is: Number of moles of CO present = 0.13 molNumber of moles of H2O present = 0.56…

Answered: Objective: Using the equilibrium…

Chemistry for Engineering Students

4th Edition

ISBN:9781337398909

Author:Lawrence S. Brown, Tom Holme

Publisher:Lawrence S. Brown, Tom Holme

Chapter12: Chemical Equilibrium

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 12.41PAE: Because calcium carbonate is a sink for CO32- in a lake, the student in Exercise 12.39 decides to go...

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

Objective: Using the equilibrium constant and reaction quotient expressions, and the ICE
table to calculate concentrations of various chemical species in the reaction.
1. The water gas shift reaction (WGSR) has a K. = 2.7 at a given temperature:
CO(g) + H₂O(g) — CO₂(g) + H₂(g)
0.13 mol of CO, 0.56 mol of H₂O, 0.62 mol of CO2, and 0.43 mol of H₂ are placed in an
evacuated 2.0 L flask.
a. Prove or disprove that this is an equilibrium mixture, using the reaction quotient.
b. Write an ICE (initial, change, equilibrium) table for the conditions given. Fill in the
"change" line, consistent with your answer to part a.
c. Solve the ICE table and write the equilibrium concentrations for all four chemical
species.
d. The simplifying assumption that the change in concentration of the reactants is
SMALL (and therefore negligible to the calculation) compared to the initial concentration
of the reactants. Is this assumption justified in this reaction and these conditions? Do a
little math to prove your point.

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 7 steps with 14 images

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Follow-up Questions

Read through expert solutions to related follow-up questions below.

Follow-up Question

d.The simplifying assumption that the change in concentration of the reactants is SMALL (and therefore negligible to the calculation) compared to the initial concentration of the reactants. Is this assumption justified in this reaction and these conditions? Do a little math to prove your point.

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, chemistry and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions