In December 2019, a bipartisan group of senators introduced a bill which would expand the authority of the United States Customs and Border Protection agency to seire counterfeit goods at the U.S. border that infringe on intellectual property rights. If passed, this legislation would prevent the importation of counterfeit products into the United States. The estimated global trade value of counterfeit products in 2019 was over $1 trillion. Source: Paul D. Ackerman, Gary A. Abelev, and Aimee N. Soucle, "Proposed Counterfeit Goods Selzure Act of 2019 Would Provide Design Patent Protection at the US Border" huntonretallindustryblog.com, December 18, 2019. If the Counterfeit Goods Seizure Act of 2019 does not become law, intellectual property rights do not receive the added protection from this act, and counterfeit goods continue to come across the border, which of the following would most likely occur in the United States? OA US companies would increase domestic investment in the development of more innovative products OB. Innovating companies would likely expand their US-based research and development departments. OC. Fewer patents would be issued to innovators and inventors OD. More dollars would be spent on the development of new technology

icon
Related questions
Question
In December 2019, a bipartisan group of senators introduced a bill which would expand the authority of the United States Customs and Border Protection agency to seize counterfeit goods at the
U.S. border that infringe on intellectual property rights. If passed, this legislation would prevent the importation of counterfeit products into the United States. The estimated global trade value of
counterfeit products in 2019 was over $1 trillion.
Source: Paul D. Ackerman, Gary A. Abelev, and Aimee N. Soucie, "Proposed Counterfeit Goods Selzure Act of 2019 Would Provide Design Patent Protection at the US Border,"
huntonretailindustryblog.com, December 18, 2019.
If the Counterfeit Goods Seizure Act of 2019 does not become law, intellectual property rights do not receive the added protection from this act, and counterfeit goods continue to come across
the border, which of the following would most likely occur in the United States?
OA. U.S. companies would increase domestic investment in the development of more innovative products.
OB. Innovating companies would likely expand their US-based research and development departments.
OC. Fewer patents would be issued to innovators and inventors
OD. More dollars would be spent on the development of new technology
Transcribed Image Text:In December 2019, a bipartisan group of senators introduced a bill which would expand the authority of the United States Customs and Border Protection agency to seize counterfeit goods at the U.S. border that infringe on intellectual property rights. If passed, this legislation would prevent the importation of counterfeit products into the United States. The estimated global trade value of counterfeit products in 2019 was over $1 trillion. Source: Paul D. Ackerman, Gary A. Abelev, and Aimee N. Soucie, "Proposed Counterfeit Goods Selzure Act of 2019 Would Provide Design Patent Protection at the US Border," huntonretailindustryblog.com, December 18, 2019. If the Counterfeit Goods Seizure Act of 2019 does not become law, intellectual property rights do not receive the added protection from this act, and counterfeit goods continue to come across the border, which of the following would most likely occur in the United States? OA. U.S. companies would increase domestic investment in the development of more innovative products. OB. Innovating companies would likely expand their US-based research and development departments. OC. Fewer patents would be issued to innovators and inventors OD. More dollars would be spent on the development of new technology
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer