Executives in large corporations are ultimately rewarded with big bonuses if their companies do well, particularly when there is rising stock prices. In ethics the question often is, "Just because you can, does it mean you should." Should we let those who run the corporations decide what level of negative side effects of their goods or services is “acceptable”? What are you thoughts?

Executives in large corporations are ultimately rewarded with big bonuses if their companies do well, particularly when there is rising stock prices. In ethics the question often is, "Just because you can, does it mean you should." Should we let those who run the corporations decide what level of negative side effects of their goods or services is “acceptable”? What are you thoughts?