Assume the cost of installing anti-lock brakes on a Company vehicle is $2,000. Also assume that anti-lock brakes reduce the probability of an accident by 15% and that the average damage in an accident, to vehicles and persons, is$10,000. The driver of the Company vehicle has an accident and the evidence shows that the accident would have been avoided if the vehicle had anti-lock brakes.True or false? The Company is negligent under the application of the Hand Rule.TrueO FalseA Moving to another question will save this response.Question 5 of 20

Companies have a responsibility to take reasonable precautions to ensure the safety of their…

Answered: $10,000. The driver of the Company…

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

6th Edition

ISBN:9781285869681

Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Chapter15: Purchasing Law And Ethics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6DQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Karen is on the highway headed home from Toronto. Traffic is moving slowly and she sees that an accident is the cause of the slow down. As she gets up to the scene, she notices debris and car parts all over the highway. She panics realizing she will have no choice but to drive over it. As a result, her front tires blow out and she fears damage has been done to the underside of her vehicle as well. How would Karen's insurer typically assess this loss? Comprehensive claim, as she did not hit another auto. Collision claim, as it was a single vehicle, At Fault claim. Collision claim, as it was a single vehicle. Not at Fault claim. Liability claim, as it is the third party's fault for the debris on the road.
JoeBob Truck Parts, Inc., in Austin sells certain material to Detailer “R” Stores in Omaha, Nebraska. JoeBob Truck Parts packs the parts and ships it by semi-tractor trailer to Detailer “R.” In transit across Oklahoma, a storm wrecks the tractor-trailer and scatters and shreds the truck parts across miles of bean-fields. What are the consequences if Detailer “R” bore the risk? What are the consequences if JoeBob Truck Parts bore the risk? Answer must discuss risk and title passing
Sherman is a delivery person for Ashley Furniture. One day, after delivering a chair he stopped at a fast-food restaurant to get a sandwich at the drive-through window. As he was leaving the parking lot, he accidentally hit the rear of Stan's car. Discuss the possible liability of Ashley Furniture for Sherman's accident. Would there be any difference in the potential liability of Ashley Furniture if Sherman had the accident after driving 30 miles away to visit a friend?
Homer Simpson is operating his car at around Noon yesterday. He is stopped for a red-light at the corner of Fast Food Boulevard and 257th Street, on his way to get a burger from Krusty Burger in the Fast Food District of Springfield, Florida, located in Polk County, when Barney Gumble, operating a 1982 Ford Pinto, fails to stop in time and drives into the back of Homer’s vehicle. Homer sustains serious injuries to his back, neck, and to his face when it struck the steering wheel. He is taken to Springfield General Hospital and is admitted and treated there for three weeks. After his release from the hospital, he misses another three weeks from work at the Springfield Nuclear Power Plant while recuperating at home. Gumble is uninjured from the crash. He is given a breathalyzer test and his Blood Alcohol Count registers at .22% BAC. The legal limit for BAC while operating a motor vehicle in Florida is 0.08%. Because Barney has a prior conviction for misdemeanor Driving Under the…
Does a small deductible clause in a policy make the property owner more or less likely to take precautions to prevent damage to the property?
X was injured while he was a passenger in a bus operated by Y Co. The proximate cause of the accident was the failure of the steering knuckle to work causing the driver to lose control of the wheel as a result of which the bus fell into a ditch. Can the operator now relieve itself of a liability by claiming that the real cause of accident was a fortiuitous event? Suppose that the proximate cause of the accident was a tire blowout, would that make a difference in your answer?
Determine the delictual liability from this scenario? Tree Combined School has hired a flower planting contractor to plant flowers in the school premises. The contractor came with two trucks to supply fertile soil and flowers. The deputy principal requested all educators to supervise learners during break to avoid injury. On Monday educators followed their ground duties roster very well. On Tuesday one of the educators came with a birthday cake and invited all educators to come and enjoy his birthday during break. He told educators that they should not be afraid to leave learners alone because they have a right to eat during break. While all educators (including those that were on duty) were busy enjoying themselves, one of the groundsmen came running to the deputy principal’s office to inform him that one of the grade 2 learners has been knocked down by a truck.
Katee gets car insurance from Luna Insurers Enterprises, Inc. ("LIE, Inc.). Every six months, LIE, Inc. automatically renews Katee's policy and charges Katee's credit card for the next six months. This process has been occurring for five years. One week after the automatic renewal, Katee is in a car accident, and her car is totaled. LIE, Inc. refuses to pay and claims there is not a valid contract. Was there a valid contract? O No. because Katee never agreed to silence as a form of acceptance. No, because silence is never acceptance. Yes, because Katee's account was charged. Yes, because the parties agreed to silence as acceptance arrangement. Yes, because Katee did not cancel within 24 hours of her card being charged.
An individual who has liability, medical payments, uninsured motorist, other than collision, collision, crashed into a flower shop. Damage to the shop would be paid under which coverage? A- collision coverage B- uninsured motorist C- medical payments D- liability
Cold Cuts Ltd is a company supplying frozen foods to retail outlets. On one occasion, the refrigeration unit in a van delivering supplies to two clients broken down shortly after the van left the warehouse. Both clients were taking delivery of the same type of product from a bulk stored in the company’s warehouse, and the van was loaded with sufficient to meet the two orders. When the van arrived at the first client’s premises, the food had defrosted and was no longer acceptable. Cold Cuts Ltd claimed that both clients were liable to pay for the goods since the property in the goods had passed to them when the van was loaded. Advised the clients of the position. Would your answer be different if the refrigeration unit had broken down after the first consignment had been delivered but before the second delivery had been made? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for…
In regards to the OPCF 43 limited waiver of depreciation endorsement, what is the insured NOT required to do? Use original equipment parts to repair the vehicle. Settle a claim by paying the actual purchase price of the car. Settle the claim using the Manufacturers Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) of the vehicle. Settle the claim using the cost of replacing the vehiclywith one of same make and model.
82 of 90 Your insured's autornobile is damaged by another automobile owned and driven by his brother. The brother is found responsible for the $1,000 damage but does not carry any automobile insurance. Your insured carries a standard O.A.P Owner's Policy with Liability, standard Accident Benefits, Uninsured Automobile and Direct Compensation Property Damage, but with no Collision coverage. How much will your insured's policy pay? Nothing, as your insured had no collision insurance. Nothing, since the other driver is related to the insured. $500.00

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

Operations Management

ISBN:

9781285869681

Author:

Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

Operations Management

ISBN:

9781285869681

Author:

Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS