Consider the following two, completely separate economies. The expected return and volatility of all stocks in both economies are the same. In the first economy, all stocks move together in good times all prices rise together and in bad times, they all fall together. In the second economy, stock returns are independent-one stock increasing in price has no effect on the prices of other stocks. Which economy would you choose to invest in? Explain your rationale for your choic

Consider the following two, completely separate economies. The expected return and volatility of all stocks in both economies are the same. In the first economy, all stocks move together in good times all prices rise together and in bad times, they all fall together. In the second economy, stock returns are independent-one stock increasing in price has no effect on the prices of other stocks. Which economy would you choose to invest in? Explain your rationale for your choic

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337514835

Author:MOYER

Publisher:MOYER

Chapter8: Analysis Of Risk And Return

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 12QTD

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

You are a risk-averse investor who is considering investing in one of two economies. The expectedreturn and volatility of all stocks in both economies is the same. In the first economy, all stocks movetogether in good times all prices rise together, and in bad times they all fall together. In the secondeconomy, stock returns are independent one stock increasing in price has no effect on the prices ofother stocks. Which economy would you choose to invest in? Explain. a. A risk averse investor would prefer the economy in which stock returns are independent becauseby combining the stocks into a portfolio he or she can get a higher expected return than in theeconomy in which all stocks move together.b. A risk averse investor would choose the economy in which stock returns are independent becauserisk can be diversified away in a large portfolio.c. A risk averse investor is indifferent in both cases because he or she faces unpredictable risk.d. A risk averse investor would choose the economy…
What are efficient markets? Imagine if the price of a stock is going up and financial markets are efficient what can you tell us about the nature of the stock? What if the markets are inefficient then how would you react to increasing prices for a particular stock?
The efficient markets hypothesis identifies three forms of market efficiency. (a) You observed that high-level managers make superior returns on investments in their company’s stock. Would this be a violation of weak-form market efficiency? Would it be a violation of strong-form market efficiency? (b) If the weak form of the efficient market hypothesis is valid, must the strong form also hold? Conversely, does strong form efficiency imply weak form efficiency? (c) Stock XYZ, which traded for several months at a price of K72, and then declines to K65. if the stock eventually begins to increase in price, K72 is considered a resistance level because investors who bought originally at K72 will be eager to sell their shares as soon as they can break even on their investment. If everyone in the market believes in resistance levels, why do these beliefs not become self-fulfilling prophecies?
1. Which form of market efficiency is the best among weak, semi strong and strong? 2. Is stock market efficient? Give logic in favour of your answer
According to the efficient market theory, whenever investors find that the required return of stock is less than the expected return of the stock, the investor will buy the stock. This will: a. drive the price up b. cause the market to crash c. drive the price down d. not affect the price
Which of the following statements is most correct? Why?* a. If a market is weak-form efficient, this means that prices rapidly reflect all available public information. b. If a market is weak-form efficient, this means that you can expect to beat the market by using technical analysis that relies on the charting of past prices. c. If a market is strong-form efficient, this means that all stocks should have the same expected return. d. All of the statements above are correct. c. None of the statements above is correct.
True or False. and briefly explain. a. Under the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), if a stock has a zero beta, then it must be identical to the riskfree asset. b. For Value at Risk (VaR) to be useful, the returns have to be normally distributed. c.If the borrowing rate is higher than the lending rate, a particular risk-averse investor can achieve a maximized utility score of UC* by choosing optimally. Now if the borrowing rate is equal to the lending rate, this investor must be able to achieve a utility score higher than UC*
please answer both. If a stock's fair return increases, what will happen to the stock's value? A. It will increase. B. It will not change. C. It will decrease. If the market risk premium rises, what will happen to the stock's price? A. It will not change. B. It will increase. C. It will decrease.
Hello Can you please assist with question 6 attached. The question is: What is the probability that the economy will be neutral and the stock will experience poor performance?
Answer the following questions: A. Explain why the price of many individual stocks still goes down, even when the overall stock market goes up. b. How can you avoid the value of your stock from going down?
Which of the following statements about the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) is incorrect? Group of answer choices a)If the market is strong-form efficient, investors can not earn abnormal returns using inside information. b) If the investment in small firms earns a positive abnormal return, the stock market is not semi-strong form efficient. c) If a market is efficient, investors tend to follow a passive investment strategy. d) If the future stock price change depends on its history, the market is not weak-form efficient. e) If a market is weak-form efficient, fundamental analysis can not earn a positive abnormal return.
Suppose we observe from market data that, for a given non-dividend paying stock, F, ± Soer. What might explain the inequality in this relationship (i.e. why don't we observe Fo = Soe"T) if markets are efficient? Hint: try to identify real-world market frictions that might cause cases where Fo + Soe™" does not result in arbitrage opportunities