A piece of new equipment has been proposed by engineers to increase the productivity of a certain manual welding operation. The investment cost is $23522 and the equipment will have a market value of $6723 at the end of a study period of five years. Increased productivity attributable to the equipment will amount to $9350 per year after extra operating costs have been subtracted from the revenue generated by the additional production. If the firm's MARR is 20% per year, What is the Present Worth (PW) for this proposal?

A piece of new equipment has been proposed by engineers to increase the productivity of a certain manual welding operation. The investment cost is $23522 and the equipment will have a market value of $6723 at the end of a study period of five years. Increased productivity attributable to the equipment will amount to $9350 per year after extra operating costs have been subtracted from the revenue generated by the additional production. If the firm's MARR is 20% per year, What is the Present Worth (PW) for this proposal?

Name: A piece of new equipment has been proposed by engineers to increase t
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T06:50:59.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: A piece of new equipment has been proposed by engineers to increase the productivity of a certain manual welding operation. The investment cost is $23522 and theequipment will have a market value of $6723 at the end of a study period of five years.

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337514835

Author:MOYER

Publisher:MOYER

Chapter9: Capital Budgeting And Cash Flow Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 18P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Gina Ripley, president of Dearing Company, is considering the purchase of a computer-aided manufacturing system. The annual net cash benefits and savings associated with the system are described as follows: The system will cost 9,000,000 and last 10 years. The companys cost of capital is 12 percent. Required: 1. Calculate the payback period for the system. Assume that the company has a policy of only accepting projects with a payback of five years or less. Would the system be acquired? 2. Calculate the NPV and IRR for the project. Should the system be purchasedeven if it does not meet the payback criterion? 3. The project manager reviewed the projected cash flows and pointed out that two items had been missed. First, the system would have a salvage value, net of any tax effects, of 1,000,000 at the end of 10 years. Second, the increased quality and delivery performance would allow the company to increase its market share by 20 percent. This would produce an additional annual net benefit of 300,000. Recalculate the payback period, NPV, and IRR given this new information. (For the IRR computation, initially ignore salvage value.) Does the decision change? Suppose that the salvage value is only half what is projected. Does this make a difference in the outcome? Does salvage value have any real bearing on the companys decision?
Manzer Enterprises is considering two independent investments: A new automated materials handling system that costs 900,000 and will produce net cash inflows of 300,000 at the end of each year for the next four years. A computer-aided manufacturing system that costs 775,000 and will produce labor savings of 400,000 and 500,000 at the end of the first year and second year, respectively. Manzer has a cost of capital of 8 percent. Required: 1. Calculate the IRR for the first investment and determine if it is acceptable or not. 2. Calculate the IRR of the second investment and comment on its acceptability. Use 12 percent as the first guess. 3. What if the cash flows for the first investment are 250,000 instead of 300,000?
The Rodriguez Company is considering an average-risk investment in a mineral water spring project that has an initial after-tax cost of 170,000. The project will produce 1,000 cases of mineral water per year indefinitely, starting at Year 1. The Year-1 sales price will be 138 per case, and the Year-1 cost per case will be 105. The firm is taxed at a rate of 25%. Both prices and costs are expected to rise after Year 1 at a rate of 6% per year due to inflation. The firm uses only equity, and it has a cost of capital of 15%. Assume that cash flows consist only of after-tax profits because the spring has an indefinite life and will not be depreciated. a. What is the present value of future cash flows? (Hint: The project is a growing perpetuity, so you must use the constant growth formula to find its NPV.) What is the NPV? b. Suppose that the company had forgotten to include future inflation. What would they have incorrectly calculated as the projects NPV?
Falkland, Inc., is considering the purchase of a patent that has a cost of $50,000 and an estimated revenue producing life of 4 years. Falkland has a cost of capital of 8%. The patent is expected to generate the following amounts of annual income and cash flows: A. What is the NPV of the investment? B. What happens if the required rate of return increases?
A piece of new equipment has been proposed by engineers to increase the productivity of a certain manual welding operation. The investment cost is $25,000, and the equipment will have a market value of $5,000 at the end of a study period of five years. Increased productivity attributable to the equipment will amount to $8,000 per year after extra operating costs have been subtracted from the revenue generated by the additional production. The firm's MARR is 20% per year. Find the present worth equivalent of all cash flows. [Select] Find the future worth equivalent of all cash flows. [ Select] Find the annual worth equivalent of all cash flows. (Select ]
A piece of new equipment has been proposed by engineers to increase the productivity of a certain manual welding operation. The investment cost is 2,500,000, and the equipment will have a market value of 50,000 at the end of a study period of 15 years. Increased productivity attributable to the equipment will amount to 500,000 per year after extra operating costs have been subtracted from the revenue generated by the additional production. If the firm’s Minimum Attractive Rate of Return is 22% per year, is this proposal a sound one? Use Annual Worth Method.
A piece of new equipment has been proposed by engineers to increase the productivity of a certain manual welding operation. The investment cost is $25,000, and the equipment will have a market value of $5,000 at the end of a study period of five years. Increased productivity attributable to the equipment will amount to $8,000 per year after extra operating costs have been subtracted from the revenue generated by the additional production. The firm's MARR is 20% per year. Find the present worth equivalent of all. cash flows. $934.29 Find the future worth equivalent of all $2324.80 cash flows. Find the annual worth equivalent of all cash flows. $312.40
Maui Fabricators Inc. is considering an investment in equipment that will replace direct labor. The equipment has a cost of $123,000 with a $11,000 residual value and a ten-year life. The equipment will replace one employee who has an average wage of $22,500 per year. In addition, the equipment will have operating and energy costs of $5,940 per year. Determine the average rate of return on the equipment, giving effect to straight-line depreciation on the investment. If required, round to the nearest whole percent.
The management of a manufacturing company is planning to buy a new milling machine. The investment cost is $17,613. At the end of its 6-year expected life, the equipment will have a salvage value of $8,000. There is an upgrade cost of $9,572 at the end of year 3. The equipment can save $5,000 per year by increasing productivity. Suppose that ϵ=MARR=18%. Determine the project’s ERR.
A piece of new equipment has been proposed by engineers to increase the productivity of a certain manual welding operation. The investment cost is $25,000, and the equipment will have a market value of $5,000 at the end of a study period of five years. Increased productivity attributable to the equipment will amount to $8,000 per year after extra operating costs have been subtracted from the revenue generated by the additional production. Evaluate the IRR of the proposed equipment. Is the investment a good one? Recall that the MARR is 20% per year.
An equipment costing $57,500 is being considered for a production process at Dew Chemicals. The expected benefits per year is $4,500 and estimated salvage value is $10,000. Determine the rate of return the company can get in this equipment proposal. Equipment life = 15 years.
A company is considering the introduction of a new product line. The initial investmentrequired for this project is $620,000, and annual maintenance costs are anticipated to be$53,400. Annual operating costs will be $10.5 per unit, and each unit of product can be soldfor $76. If the MARR is 10% and the project has a life of 6 years.What is the minimum annual production level for which the project is economicallyviable