I need help with these question stions use the following data provided to answer questions samples?3. The citizens decide to retest the water and obtain a new average of 11.2 +/- 0.2 micrograms per liter; theyagain argue for action. Write a brief statement about accuracy and precision that best describes this newdata reported by the concerned citizens.4. Suppose the water board rejected the citizens revised arsenic readings (11.2 +/- 0.2 µg/l) because theywere not the official readings.A. Circle which characteristic of poor/bad science most applies? (Bad science: attacks the scientist, misusesauthority, confuses cause and effect, poor statistics)OR Circle which characteristic of good science has been violated: tentative, testable/tested, empirical - usesdata/observations, natural explanation.B. Explain how that applies:3Edited from D. Steer, The Good Earth. Also created by K. Sasowsky (Sup. Ex.3, 7, 6a, parts of Sup. Ex. A&B, part, 24, 25, 38, Sup. Alt. Energy 1 and 2, Sup. Switchthe Energy Project Discussion Questions); copyrights retained by authors, 2021. Earth SUPPLEMENTAL EXERCISES - ESCI 103L - Cuyahoga Community CollegeWater Quality - Accuracy and Precision Exer. 2 (1 p.) Name (Last, First) Adrian Fernandezntroduction: A group of concerned citizens was worried that their local water supply might be contaminatedwith naturally occurring arsenic after seeing a map displayed showing they lived in an area of high arsenicconcentrations. They decided to test water from 4 wells in their local area; each well was sampled and tested 4different times. After analyzing the data (below), the citizens wrote a letter to the editor of a local newspaperarguing that their data proved that the water supply exceeded the maximum permitted level of arsenic in watersupplies (10 micro-grams per liter). They demanded immediate government action to address the problem.The local water board tested the same water the same number of times and found average concentrations of 8.1+/- 0.2 micrograms per liter (+/- refers to the "precision", or how much variability there is). Assume thewater board's reported measurements are the true value ("accurate").Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Average14.07.012.08.018.010.016.014.023.05.03.019.07.021.07.021.0AverageConcentrations in micro-grams per literWell123410.314.512.514.012.8

Question

I need help with these question stions use the following data provided to answer questions samples?3. The citizens decide to retest the water and obtain a new average of 11.2 +/- 0.2 micrograms per liter; theyagain argue for action. Write a brief statement about accuracy and precision that best describes this newdata reported by the concerned citizens.4. Suppose the water board rejected the citizens revised arsenic readings (11.2 +/- 0.2 µg/l) because theywere not the official readings.A. Circle which characteristic of poor/bad science most applies? (Bad science: attacks the scientist, misusesauthority, confuses cause and effect, poor statistics)OR Circle which characteristic of good science has been violated: tentative, testable/tested, empirical - usesdata/observations, natural explanation.B. Explain how that applies:3Edited from D. Steer, The Good Earth. Also created by K. Sasowsky (Sup. Ex.3, 7, 6a, parts of Sup. Ex. A&B, part, 24, 25, 38, Sup. Alt. Energy 1 and 2, Sup. Switchthe Energy Project Discussion Questions); copyrights retained by authors, 2021. Earth SUPPLEMENTAL EXERCISES - ESCI 103L - Cuyahoga Community CollegeWater Quality - Accuracy and Precision Exer. 2 (1 p.) Name (Last, First) Adrian Fernandezntroduction: A group of concerned citizens was worried that their local water supply might be contaminatedwith naturally occurring arsenic after seeing a map displayed showing they lived in an area of high arsenicconcentrations. They decided to test water from 4 wells in their local area; each well was sampled and tested 4different times. After analyzing the data (below), the citizens wrote a letter to the editor of a local newspaperarguing that their data proved that the water supply exceeded the maximum permitted level of arsenic in watersupplies (10 micro-grams per liter). They demanded immediate government action to address the problem.The local water board tested the same water the same number of times and found average concentrations of 8.1+/- 0.2 micrograms per liter (+/- refers to the &#34;precision&#34;, or how much variability there is). Assume thewater board's reported measurements are the true value (&#34;accurate&#34;).Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Average14.07.012.08.018.010.016.014.023.05.03.019.07.021.07.021.0AverageConcentrations in micro-grams per literWell123410.314.512.514.012.8

Accepted Answer

The stated precision (+/- 0.2 micrograms per liter) indicates an improvement over the prior data,…