preview

Salem Witch Trials Case Review

Decent Essays

The Salem Witch Trials was one of the most out of the box things back in 1692 Massachusetts, but it still seems to be quite unexplainable and at times shady. More than 200 people were accused of practicing the devil’s magic, but only about 20 were executed. Though people were killed, the colonists eventually admitted that the Salem Witch Trials were actually a mistake for which they later compensated the families that were convicted. I picked the Salem Witch Trials to type about because I would like to completely understand all of the viewpoints surrounding the hysteria of what is known to be the Salem Witch Trials. I have heard many odd details about this and I’d like to clarify my questions about what is true and what isn’t. Salem Witch …show more content…

” She states this in order to emphasize that her study was better organized than it was written, and that maybe a better writer could have approached this theory in more depth and even with better detail. This researcher feels that this article was well supported but could’ve been better written. The author has also referred to Arthur Asher Miller’s “The Crucible.” She uses this as a reference in order to show that Norton fails to mention the most important literacy that happens to be the reason that the majority of living American’s knowledge of the Salem Witch Trials even exists. She stays organized by micro-critiquing both good aspects of Norton’s work and also the bad aspects. Balee states that Norton’s idea behind the witches of Salem was due to the fear of Indians. She then goes into the details of the first few accused witches and their situations and how they were handled. The author does not have bias towards the subject of the Salem Witch Trials because she spends most of her article critiquing someone else’s work instead of trying to build a different viewpoint for a separate work. She quotes much of Norton’s article “In the Devil’s Snare: The Salem Witchcraft Crisis of 1692,” as well as tearing it down word by word and explaining the viewpoint of how Norton approached this. The author sometimes uses vocabulary that is difficult to understand and she switches from the story and critiquing, but is overall comprehendible if you can keep up. The only way this

Get Access