I. Introduction
Economic stagnation has plagued Puerto Rico’s last decade. In recent debates on its debt crisis, a point of controversy has surrounded the factors producing the crisis. Some argue that this crisis is due to the Puerto Rican government’s inability to properly manage and invest federal funds into the local economy. On the other hand, some scholars point to the island’s colonial ties to the United States as the primary factor crumbling the island’s economy. Specifically, debate has surrounded the practice of cabotage laws in regulating commerce with the island as a factor in its economic depression. Without a doubt, Puerto Rico’s colonial status and its economic ties with the United States have proven deadly to its economic progression.
…show more content…
This federal piece of legislation, specifically federal statute 46 USC section 883, “controls coast wide trade within the United States and determines which ships may lawfully engage in that trade and the rules under which they operate ”. Furthermore, this act prohibits any foreign vessel from engaging in maritime trade within the United States. This has had serious implications to the costs of goods in the island as well as the amount of profits that are retained in Puerto Rico. “The Jones Act, in general, requires that maritime transport of cargo between points in the U.S be carried by vessels that are owned by U.S. citizens and registered under the U.S flag with a coastwise endorsement, which in turn requires that such vessels be built in the United States. ”
This highlights the main debate against the act, which claims that it “increases the costs of shipping Thus, the most important aspect of the Jones Act that applies to Puerto Rico is that it recognizes the importance of a maritime fleet in the development of foreign and domestic commerce. However, this development applies to the United States, not to Puerto Rico. This is exemplified in the island’s high living costs, which make it 21% to live in Puerto Rico than in the
…show more content…
The World Trade Organization, in which the U.S. is an active member and which laws impact Puerto Rico directly, has actively worked towards liberalizing the maritime transportation service. Under the Uruguay Round, the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) marked one of the landmarked achievements of the round . In the ongoing Doha Development Round, free trade service sector negotiations are in agenda but have not yet reached an agreement. As a result, it is important to take note of international efforts in trying to regulate international shipping because of its importance in international markets. However, since there is no global regimen governing shipping much of the activity is left to the discretion of the parties involved in trade. As a result, laws like the Jones Act continue to regulate shipping
This act would forbid any U.S. ship to sail from an U.S. port to a foreign port. In developing this act, Jefferson had hoped to find an alternating from war. The act failed. American coastal cities were soon desolated. All segments of the American economy were being affected by this act. The paralysis effect on the American economy accompanied by the almost unaffected economy of Great Britain led to only one thing, the American people were turning against one another.3 The American leaders learned one thing from this act, the war could not be fought through economic pressure, it would have to be won by military action.
The attempted assassination of President Truman was an indication that Puerto Ricans would use any necessary means to gain independence. Puerto Rico has been a territory of the United States for almost a century. The citizens of Puerto Rico have always had different views on whether they want independence or greater autonomy. The following essay will focus on the commonwealth status of Puerto Rico and the attempted assassination of President Truman.
Navigation acts: laws that restricted the use of foreign ships for the use of trade trade between Britain and its colonies
In response to this act the United States passed the Embargo Act of 1807 which prohibited all American ships from trading in all foreign ports. The goal with this act was to get England and France to stop restricting American trade but it did not happen. This later would backfire and instead of benefiting the Americans it would unpleasantly affected all regions of the United States and all segments of the economy. It especially hit the New England region were many ship ports were located. It also affected the prices of cotton which in hand affected the South forcing many planters out of business.
For five decades the United States and Cuba have been at each other’s throats, this is reason that fifty plus years ago the U.S. created and embargo act against Cuba making all business between the two country’s illegal. But after such a long time of this going on President Barrack Obama ends the act and thus opens the doors for business between the two countries (Alonso, 2016). What had initiated the ending of this embargo act was the trade of prisoners between the countries. This has people wandering what to do now, where do we start, and is there certain factors we need to be aware of to establish business with and or
In the article, “Why Do We Still Have an Embargo of Cuba?” Patrick Haney explores the history of the embargo and the different factors which have maintained and tightened its restrictions over the past fifty years. The embargo consists of a ban on trade and commercial activity, a ban on travel, a policy on how Cuban exiles can enter the U.S., and media broadcasting to the island. These once-executive orders now codified into law by the Helms-Burton Act, have become a politically charged topic which wins and loses elections, spawned influential interest groups, and powerful political action committees.
Commerce includes not only traffic but intercourse including the intercourse between states, parts of nations, and in all branches. If commerce does not include navigation the national government does not have any direct power, nor can it make any laws regarding American vessels. However, this power has been exercised by the federal government, understood to be consented to by all, and has included navigation.
Another major, and widely covered issue with the territory of Puerto Rico is the drug and crime violence sweeping the region. According to the Puerto Rico Police Department, 63% of the 744 murders on the island during 2001 were related to drug distribution activities. Also 70-80% of homicides involving firearms are attributed to disagreements over drugs and turf. Common and easy to obtain drugs include; cocaine, heroin, and marijuana. Also keep in mind that drugs such as heroin and cocaine are not cheap at all, so how do you expect addicts to afford to use them, that is right crime. Puerto Rico is situated in the middle of three trans- Caribbean smuggling routes. While Dominican traffickers control the shipment of cocaine and marijuana from Puerto Rico to the United States Caribbean nations also serve as offshore banking centers used for money laundering and income tax evasion. Also its constant flights to and from The
One of the United States most important foreign trading partners was Cuba. The Cuban and the US economy had been intertwined for nearly a decade before the turn of the 20th century with American invests of $50 million in the Cuban economy. Americans owned the most valuable land in Cuba, which were the sugar plantations. More than 90% of Cuba’s sugar was exported to the United States7. Most of the imports to Cuba and the surrounding islands came from the US. If the Cuban market closed the US would lose not only its $50 million in investments, but also millions in lost revenue from not being able to trade with Cuba.
The Embargo Act of 1807 was enacted by President Thomas Jefferson. This act stated that American ships can’t sail into foreign ports and foreign ships may not enter american ports or shipping docks. The goal of the Embargo Act of 1807 was to force Britain and France to respect American rights. This Embargo Act was a very costly failure because the economy dropped about eighty-six million dollars from 1807 to 1808. Also illegal smuggling in the U.S. raised and many sailors found themselves without jobs. Jefferson thought that the people would obey the law and when the didn’t he found himself violating the most precious of laws; individual liberties.
Since the 1560s, the English had sought for mercantilism, using government funding and charters to control manufacturing and foreign trade. When the Navigation Act of 1651 established, trades were limited only to English or colonial merchants. Any sugar or tobacco products can only be exported to England, and mandating colonists imported European goods only through England. The Revenue Act of 1673 imposed a ” plantation duty” on American exports of sugar and tobacco for paying the custom official who enforced these mercantilist laws. However, this enforcement didn’t go successfully, many colonists ignored the laws and continued trading with the Dutch until the wars of 1690s. Soon the Massachusetts Bay Assembly declared these mercantilism laws should be enforced only in Britain, not in America. Customs official Edward Randolph shortly called troops over to America to administer, instead, the Lords of Trade who charged with colonial affairs, blamed the puritan government violating the Navigation Acts and nearly outlawing the Church of
When Canadian laws collide with laws in the United States with reference to trade with Cuba, which side prevails? More specifically, when an American subsidiary is operating in Canada and engages in profitable trade or export-related activities with Cuba which is illegal from the point of view of the U.S. Department of Justice what will happen to that U.S. subsidiary in Canada? Which side is right and which side is in the wrong? Is it fair for an American subsidiary operating in Canada to be held accountable for what some view as archaic U.S. laws that forbid any trade with Cuba? These issues and others related to the U.S. embargo on trade with Cuba will be presented in this paper.
Americanization is the concept for the influence the United States has on other countries such as Puerto Rico. Moreover, this includes from their language, culture and even politics. Changing the people’s customs from that country and making them their own. The customs are not necessarily imposed but by having the concept integrated, the people of the country modify some aspects themselves. In like manner, Americanization can be referred to as racial relations that deal with the adaptation of different races. Hence, this is in equality to an essential part of national life. It is a difficult process that contemplates adaptation, incorporation and assimilation of the society. When integrating the United States culture, traditions and their economic system, Americanization can especially be seen as an imposition. Relatively, as occurred with Puerto
The Jones Act of 1920 was one of the major pieces of legislation that fostered the dependent relationship. The Act calls for all products entering or leaving the island by water to be transported by United States vessels. The law was intended as a protectionist measure for U.S. shipping companies, but it created a huge inefficiency where shipping companies will offload and reload products in Florida before heading towards the island. The result is significantly inflated prices on the island, a problem that still exist today, and the lost opportunity in Puerto Rico never developing its
The case concerns the ECʼs preferential banana importation treatment to certain African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries. The Appellate Body upheld the panel’s ruling that the ECʼs regime for importation, sale and distribution of bananas was inconsistent with certain GATT Articles.17) Ecuador, one of the complaining countries, sought to retaliate against the EC when the latter was found, by a compliance panel under DSU Article 21.5, to have failed to implement the DSB rulings. The crucial element in Ecuador’s request was that it was the first case where a complaining party requested to retaliate under the TRIPS Agreement. The arbitration panel found that Ecuador could request authorization to suspend its concessions or other obligations in certain sectors under the TRIPS Agreement, with the level not exceeding US $201.6 million per year.