preview

Manifest Destiny Transcendentalism

Good Essays

The Foundation for “Manifest Destiny”
Scholars have outlined how Transcendental thought was foundational for the idea of Manifest Destiny (Johannsen 12). Yet, a more complex relationship between Transcendentalism and Manifest Destiny is revealed when looking at the amenability between Emerson’s views on self-reliance and the 19th century Manifest Destiny doctrine. Indeed, America’s commitment to Manifest Destiny seems to require the nation to embrace the independence characteristic associated with Emerson’s “self-reliance.” However, Emerson’s condemnations of conformity, reliance on property, and preoccupation with the future reveal incompatibilities between the two intellectual teachings.
Before assessing the degree of harmony between Emerson’s self-reliance and Manifest Destiny, an understanding of Manifest Destiny’s historical background is necessary. Information from historian Robert Johannsen’s essay “The Meaning of Manifest Destiny” provides much of the needed context. John Louis O’Sullivan originally penned the term in 1845 to refer to “the belief that the United States was guided by a providential destiny, in other words, that the nation had a preordained, God-sanctioned mission to fulfill” (Johannsen 10). The idea of Manifest Destiny was initially used to provide grounds for the American annexation of Texas (Johannsen 7). Within the same year, O’Sullivan supported a different territorial expansion on the grounds of America’s Manifest Destiny for a second time. The

Get Access