How Did Charles I Cause The English Civil War

In April 1642, the Civil war started in England. The civil war ended up by King Charles losing the war. And in my essay I am going to talk about many reasons why Charles lost the civil war.

The Civil War was caused by the economics of slavery and the political control of that system, specifically being states’ rights on the federal powers of the government, the territorial expansion of the united states that led to the division of the two sides, and the election of President Abraham Lincoln which was the final event that sent the nation to war.

Many causes led to the Civil War. This all happened around the mid 1800s. It was a conflict between the Northern and Southern states. Both sides had their own view on slavery, and their separate views caused contentions between the two. Both had different views on whether to expand or stop slavery growth to the West, or have slavery at all.

Although some historians feel that the Civil War was a result of political blunders and that the issue of slavery did not cause the conflict, they ignore the two main causes. The expansion of slavery, and its entrance into the political scene.

The Civil War was caused by many several pressures, principles, and prejudices, fueled by sectional differences, and was finally set into motion by a most unlikely set of political events. From economic differences to political differences all the way up to cultural differences, the North and the South opposed each other. These tensions were further increased after the western expansion of the United States. By the early 1850’s a civil war was known to be likely coming soon.

The Kingdom of Great Britain was in war with Spain and French and the King of Britain, Charles I was in need of money and he had exhausted all the sources to raise the money. The Parliament of 1626 had not voted for taxation, Charles decided to demand money from his subjects by sending request letters . As most of them denied to pay the money, Charles declared Forced Loans(The Loan of Five Subsidies) and denial to repayment will be answerable to Privy Council. Apart levying forced loans, Charles also began to billet his soldiers in the houses of civilians all along the South Coast of England and the soldiers were immune from local being military subjects.

The causes of most wars are often very complex, but in the America civil war it came down to two major issues, slavery and the protection of the Union. In the North, they were growing richer all the time as industry developed fast. The workers were mostly immigrants with low wages. The South didn’t have these resources, and the slaves were essential for them. The Northern politicians insisted that the Slavery should be abolished and that this was an evil system that should be stamped out. Only the rich wool farmers and other wealthy

The Civil War was caused by the idea of States’ rights, the hypocrisy of the United States in its celebration of ‘Independence Day’ while slavery existed, and the election of President Abraham Lincoln.

The Civil War was caused by economic conflict, slavery issues and the disagreements between the North and South.

What actions led Parliament force Charles I to accept the Petition of Right? How would Charles I have attempted to defend himself and his actions? What freedoms did the Petition guarantee?-disputes between Parliament and King Charles I over the execution of the Thirty Years’ War, Parliament refused to grant subsidies to support the war effort, leading to Charles gathering "forced loans" without Parliamentary approval and arbitrarily imprisoning those who refused to pay. The Petition guaranteed restrictions on non-Parliamentary taxation, forced billeting of soldiers, imprisonment without cause, and restricts the use of martial law.

The Bishop’s war started in 1639 and ended on 1645. The bishop’s war was a religious conflict of the rights and the powers of the crown that was governed by the Church of Scotland. Scotland won the bishop’s war. The English civil war started in August 22 December 1642 and it ended in September 3 1651. The war was a political machinations and armed problems between the cavaliers and the Roundheads. The war’s cause was that the Roundheads and the cavaliers both wanted to govern England. The Roundheads or the parliaments won the English civil

The civil war was mainly sparked by tensions between the north and the south. Both sides rarely agreed on topics and could never make a compromise. Slavery was a big reason for the start of the civil war, but the causes don’t end there. Although some may say that political or economic reasons started the civil war between the north and the south, political reasons were the real cause. This is because of important decisions made by the government, and the south seceding.

In the article King Charles the First, 1600-1649, it talks about how Charles gained the throne, how his reign was destructive which in turn caused a civil war, but was significant because his reign resulted in the abolishment of monarchy from the English government. In the beginning, Charles physical being in his youth was a dilemma, but he overcame it and gained the “throne of the Three Kingdoms: England, Scotland, and Ireland” (page 1) in 1625. Charles personal reign as the King was a backfire because he gave authority to Duke of Buckingham, whom led “disastrous military expeditions against Spain and France” (page 2) during the Thirty Year War. Charles decision-making skills as King were horrible because when he got rid of Parliament three

The major political issues that divided the Parliament and the monarch, and ultimately lead to the English Civil War, were the want of the nobility to raise their status as it kept falling during the reign of the Stuarts, and the desire of the monarch to attain serious power without much consent from the Parliament. Over and over again the monarch took too much power and angered the Parliament, forcing them to retaliate with strict restrictions on the power of the monarch. When James I took control of the English monarch after Elizabeth he was not well liked and people did not trust him. James I further alienated himself from the nobility (Parliament) when he decided that he needed more money than Parliament was giving him and developed ways