preview

Greek History Vs Christian History

Good Essays

In classical antiquity, two great traditions had dominance in the art of history: Greek and Christian. This paper will discuss three primary topics in regard to each tradition's historiography, namely, what history is, what sources they used and by what method they are analyzed, and what is the relevance of studying history. Each topic will be explained for each tradition and a comparison between the traditions will follow per topic. As a whole, it will be demonstrated that the Greek and Christian historians differed in their presuppositions taken to the historical records, and this is what caused their superficial differences. For early Greek historians, history was the chronological account of past events. Both Herodotus and Thucydides endeavored to described these events by explaining the human actions behind them through natural means, not divine means. As stated, Herodotus viewed events as chronologically successive. In other words, events happened one after the other with causal relations between them. Moreover, Thucydides …show more content…

History served the purpose of demonstrating God's dealings with humanity, verified kingships, and was a source of truth about God and religious dogma. The study of history, then, took on a meaning that was relevant to the people who studied it, despite the fact that the students of it were not remotely close to the time period the events they studied took place. This is the case since divinely authorized kings would affect how persons viewed their current political situation, and it showed them that trials that they faced were not very different from other trials that took place due to the hand of God. Therefore, the relevance of history to the Christian was not merely a look into the past, but also a look into why the present is as it is and what the moral standing of the people are as a

Get Access