My partner and I affirm the resolution. Resolve: To alleviate income inequality in the United States, increased spending on public infrastructure should be prioritized over increased spending on means-tested welfare programs.
We would like to offer the following terms:
According to dictionary.com infrastructure is defined as: the basic physical and organizational structures and facilities.
Contention 1: High quality public infrastructure reduces the economical gap.
1.The Jakarta Post states: “Good infrastructure is like a magnet for investors, both foreign and domestic. No doubt, as a result of the lack of infrastructure in disadvantaged areas, investors tend to prefer to invest in urban areas that already have adequate infrastructure.”
…show more content…
By increasing public infrastructure of education, people will have chances to choose their jobs.
Contention 3: Making jobs by developing infrastructure.
1.The International Labor Organisation states, “ African countries are increasingly appreciating the potential of linking infrastructure investments to employment creation and poverty reduction, thereby addressing both deficits in the fight against poverty.” (http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_policy/---invest/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_392965.pdf)
2.This explains that if the government increase work on public infrastructure, there will be more jobs for planning and working in the field. This will help both environment and people by developing the environment while giving people jobs.
3.By developing infrastructure in poor countries, people will have jobs to work on which will be the route for reducing the poverty and income inequality.
My partner and I negate the resolution. Resolve: To alleviate income inequality in the United States, increased spending on means-tested welfare programs should be prioritized over increased spending on public
It was estimated that if the corporate welfare dollars were distributed to the poorest 10% of United States families, homes would receive an additional $47,000 dollars annually (Huff, 1993). Another concept that resonated with me what the government spending for corporate welfare in the 80’s. There was a great deal of spending even in the 80’s to various expenditures and subsidized services, there was 181 billion dollars spent (Huff, 1993). It was shocking to think of how much was spent and where the cuts were made. It seems there are some type of flaws and changed that could have been made to make a difference in this gap. The concepts will contribute to my practice because I now know how far these issues date back and where the problems in the system
In Income Inequality: Too Big to Ignore, Robert H. Frank paints a picture to the reader about the struggles of pier pressure. For example: an upper-classmen chooses to buy a big house and fancy clothing. This acts as a “frame of reference” to the changes and norms of the society. If he spends money on something nice, a middle-classmen will then go and decide to do the same thing, and then a lower-classmen…all the way down the social hierarchy. This is what he calls an “expenditure cascade.” Robert relates this with a person’s downfalls, which can be traced due to lower income inequality. Income inequality basically means that in a given quantity, the dispersion of income is underlined by the gap between individuals and or households with
The issue of income inequality in the United States is complicated and does not have a definite answer. Income inequality can be measured in a few different ways. The first measurement for the income inequality in a country is to look at the percentages on households and group them into income categories, called distribution by income category. The second measurement for income inequality is called distribution by quintiles or fifths. This is when you divide the total number of people, households, families into five groups called quintiles to examine the percentage of total before tax income received by each quintile. Each quintile would then be ordered by income and households in the category.
One of the issues currently crippling the United States is the outstanding income inequality. As the American middle and lower class expand daily in population percentage, the percentage of income headed towards these people is shrinking. In direct contrast, the top 1% is gaining wealth by the minute. According to Wealth Inequality in America, the 160,000 most affluent families possess as much as the 145 million families who lie at the bottom of the economical food chain. With the ever increasing gap between poverty and comfort within the nation, the ability to climb this food chain is more difficult than it has been in decades. Sanders recognizes this pressing predicament and ___________. Sannders has presented a multiple step process that will create jobs and increase wages across the nation, starting with the fundamentals.
In any given population, there is a difference between what people within the population earn. The uneven distribution of income in any given population is income inequality. In order for there to be income, there has to be several sources of income. These sources of income may be combinational or independent per person receiving the income. Income may result from wages, rent, bank account interests, salaries or even profits made in business transactions ( Stiglitz, 2012).
The federal government has a multitude of programs all requiring continuous review to ensure efficiency. Americans do not have to search far to find examples of government fraud, waste, and abuse. The federal deficit crisis makes any examples of program waste unacceptable. A program review process needs to have clear value criteria and allow for itemized reductions to gain efficiency without losing effectiveness. There are several alternatives to federal program efficiencies including empowerment to state governments, consolidation of duplicate programs, privatization, and straight up elimination of non-value added activities. I have selected three recommended domestic programs for adjustment. The recommendations are to provide a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, require states to cover 1/4th of the cost for food stamps, and reduce the cost of the federal workforce. Impact of implementing these recommendations is a total of $520 billion to debt reduction.
Do the Goals of the Policy Positively Affect the Redistribution of Income, Resources, Rights Entitlements, Rewards, Opportunities, and Status?
Today, the state of our nation’s economic security is at stake; the gap between the the lower/middle class and the upper class grows wider every year, and the effects are devastating. There is, however, a proposed solution. The Basic Income Guarantee (BIG) bill offers a pragmatic fix to the poverty that plagues America’s lower class, but the current proposition has some flaws. First, lets discuss the contentions that make up the original bill.
There are many ailments that face the contemporary American society, all of which shape the way of life for the American populace as a whole, no matter how minute. The most iconic of these is poverty, as the homeless population of the United States is on the rise, this in conjunction with the increasingly warped spending of the governmental system. These societal ailments go hand in hand for the horrid situation of the poor has been heightened due to the government’s lack of attention and spending directed toward solving the homeless population who is overwhelmed by poverty. All of which can be tied back to priority spending, which can be defined as the thought out use of money usage that results in the most needed areas of debt being resolved first based on what is truly needed in comparison to other spending options. Though, a change in the government’s policy for spending can easily
I urge you to oppose legislative efforts to strip protections away from unaccompanied children who are fleeing from violence in Central America and seeking refuge in the United States. I urge you to support supplemental funding that provides for the care and protection of vulnerable unac- companied children, ensures that their due process rights are preserved, and addresses the root causes of their ight, particularly violence in their
However, this does not address the endogeneity between population-employment and transportation location. In other words, new subway stations can also be endogenous to employment and population location. Recent studies have emphasized that transportation network affects growth in population and employment, and locations of population and employment also influence location of transportation system (Baum-Snow, 2007; Duranton and Turner, 2012; and Garcia-Lopez, 2012).
In today’s modern society, the United States faces many public policy issues, whether those issues include social welfare, immigration or even environmental issues. Congress receives numerous issues on public polices every day, but they cannot handle and solve every issues that comes across their daily agenda, nor can they satisfy every person in this country. Congress prioritizes on those issues that are more important and relevant to find a probable solution too. A growing issue we see that in today’s society are issues in the social welfare system. Social Welfare has so many issues within some of those issues include the food stamps, and even in the healthcare system. The matters in social welfare requires every individuals help to resolve, not just congress. The second major public policy issue we face in American today are within the Public Assistance Programs. Those programs include the SNAP, SSI, and even the TANF program.
Poverty has been evident since The Great Depression in the 1930’s. Since then, there has been an attempt to lower poverty level, though only a 2.5% decrease has been seen since 1965. It is argued that we do not need another war on poverty since nothing has seemed to help, but this is an issue that affects everyone. As Mark Bittman stated in his article “Why We’re Fasting” “This is a moral issue; the budget is a moral document.” Poverty can be improved if more emphasis is added to helping individuals or families out of poverty, instead of assisting them through their lives, by improving existing laws or implementing new laws centering around the idea of a fixed income.
Engineers without Borders aims to provide those living in poverty a higher standard of living through initiatives specifically engineered for their regions. One such project designed by Engineers without Borders is the Bambui initiative. Bambui, a village located in the North West Region of Central Africa’s Cameroon contains a small portion of Cameroon’s total population of 22.25 million people. Bambui, with a population of 50,000 people and its poor standard of living proves to be an obstacle. Due to the lack of infrastructure and urban planning of the markets which provide the village with much needed income, Engineers without Borders aims to improve the area by addressing these current problems with solutions.
2. the fundamental facilities and systems serving a country, city, or area, as transportation and communication systems, power plants, and schools.