SPWeek6CaseStudies
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Jackson State University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
6120
Subject
Economics
Date
May 10, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by JusticeToadPerson1051 on coursehero.com
Santrice Price
BUSN6120
4/25/21
Page 335 Questions 9
Suppose this is a one-shot game:
a. Determine the dominant strategy for each player. If such strategies do not exist,
explain why not. A given that player 2 choose C and D, player 1’s best response is A (-10), and A (200) respectively. So, player 1’s dominant strategy is A.
b. Determine the secure strategy for each player. If such strategies do not exist, explain.
why not. Player 1’s minimum pay off from A and B, player 2’s best response is C(-10), and C(220) respectively. So, the player 2’s dominant strategy is C.
c. Determine the Nash equilibrium. There is their dominant strategy equilibrium.
Page 336 Question 13
Coca-Cola and PepsiCo are the leading competitors in the market for cola products. In
1960 Coca-Cola introduced Sprite, which today is among the worldwide leaders in the
lemon-lime soft drink market and ranks in the top 10 among all soft drinks worldwide.
Prior to 1999, PepsiCo did not have a product that competed directly against Sprite and
had to decide whether to introduce such a soft drink. By not introducing a lemon-lime
soft drink, PepsiCo would continue to earn a $200 million profit, and Coca-Cola would
continue to earn a $300 million profit. Suppose that by introducing a new lemon-lime
soft drink, one of two possible strategies could be pursued: (1) PepsiCo could trigger. A price war with Coca-Cola in both the lemon-lime and cola markets or (2) Coca-Cola could acquiesce, and each firm maintain its current 50/50 split of the cola market and split the lemon-lime market 30/70 (PepsiCo/Coca-Cola). If PepsiCo introduced a lem-on-lime soft drink and a price war resulted, both companies would earn profits of $100 million. Alternatively, Coca-Cola and PepsiCo would earn $275 million and $227 million, respectively, if PepsiCo introduced a lemon-
lime soft drink and Coca- Cola acquiesced and split the markets as listed. If you were a manager at PepsiCo, would you try to convince your colleagues that introducing the new soft drink is the most profitable strategy? Why or why not? There are two competitors in soft drink market one
is PC and other is CC Bothe firms are producing cola products. After 1960 the CC introduced a line drink. After 1999, the firm PC is deciding whether to enter in the lime market or not. The firm CC will take decision whether to cooperate or fight with firm PC. If PC decides not to introduce a lemon line soft drink, both PC and CC will continue to earn $200 million and $300 million, respectively. If PC introduces its own new lemon line soft drink, that are two possibilities.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Questions
Consider the following game:
Player 2
In Out Player 1 In -2,-2 2, 0 Out 0, 2 0, 0
(a) What is the Nash equilibrium of this game, or what are the Nash equilibriaof this game?
(b) Does either firm have a dominate strategy (a strategy that is always abest response)? Which?
(c) Suppose Player 1 could move before Player 2 and Player 2 could observe Player 1’s move. What do you think would happen?
arrow_forward
Player 1
Cooperate (C)
Defect (D)
Cooperate (C)
3,3
8,0
Player 2
Defect (D)
0,8
1,1
In general, a combination of strategies is a Nash equilibrium if ...
Every player is choosing a best response against the other players' strategies.
Every player has a positive payoff.
The players maximize the sum of their payoffs.
The players choose identical strategies.
If the game is repeated, which cooperative actions could benefit both players?
O Both players choose C.
Player 1 chooses C, Player 2 chooses D.
O Player 1 chooses D, Player 2 chooses C.
Both players choose D.
arrow_forward
Solve for the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) in each of the following games.
(a) The following two-by-two game is a little harder to solve since firm 2’spreferred strategy depends of what firm 1 does. But firm 1 has a dominantstrategy so this game has one Nash equilibrium.
Firm 2
Launch Don’tFirm 1 Launch 60, -10 100, 0 Don’t 80, 30 120, 0
What is the Nash equilibrium of this simultaneous-move game?
(b) What would the outcome of this game be if instead firm 1 moved first and then, after seeing what firm 1 chose, firm 2 chose it strategy? In this case firm 1 doesn’t necessarily need to choose a best response, but firm 2 must choose a best response since it moves second.
arrow_forward
Player 1
Cooperate (C)
Defect (D)
If the game has a dominant strategy, what is it?
There is none.
If the game has a Nash equilibrium in pure strategies, what is it?
There is none.
Cooperate (C)
3,3
8,0
Cooperate (C) is a dominant strategy for both players.
Defect (D) is a dominant strategy for both players.
Cooperate (C) is a dominant strategy for 1, and Defect (D) is a dominant strategy for 2.
C, C is the only Nash equilibrium.
D, D is the only Nash equilibrium.
C, C and D, D are both Nash equilibria.
Player 2
Defect (D)
0,8
1,1
arrow_forward
5. The following problem was first considered by John von Neumann and is a fundamentalresult game theory.A and B play the following game:A writes down either number 1 or number 2, and B must guess which one.If the number that A has written down is i and B has guessed correctly, B receives i units from A.If B makes a wrong guess, B pays 4/5 of a unit to A.First we consider the expected gain of player B.Suppose B guesses 1 with probability p and 2 with probability 1 −p.Let X1 denote B’s gain (or loss) in a game where A has written down 1.Let X2 denote B’s gain (or loss) in a game where A has written down 2.(a) Find the pmf of X1 and X2(b) Find B’s expected gain for these two cases, E[X1] and E[X2].(c) What value of p maximizes the minimum possible value of B’s expected gain?Now consider the expected loss of player ASuppose that A writes down 1 with probability q and 2 with probability 1 −q.Let Y1 be A’s loss (or gain) if B chooses number 1.Let Y2 be A’s loss (or gain) if B…
arrow_forward
Aedri
Quick Lesson in Game Theory
A Nash Equilibrium is an outcome in which neither player is better off by changing their strategy.
2.7 Is a Dominant Strategy equilibrium also a Nash equilibrium?
a) Yes
b) No
esc
The Ice Cream Guys
$3.99
$4.99
+
Chucky's
Chunky
CCT: $20,000
$3.99 ICG: $20,000
CCT: $60,000
ICG: $10,000
tab
Treats
CCT: $10,000
$4.99 ICG: $60,000
CCT: $40,000
ICG: $40,000
The table above is the payoff matrix for the annual profit of the only two ice-cream-truck firms
operating in Beach City. They are deciding the price of an ice cream cone.
%3D
caps lo
2.8 What is Chucky's dominant strategy?
a) $3.99
b) $4.99
c) Not enough information
hift
2.9 What is the dominant strategy equilibrium in this situation?
a) Both charge $3.99
b) Both charge $4.99
c) CCT charges $3.99 and ICG charges $4.99
d) CCT charges $4.99 and ICG charges $3.99
2.10 Suppose these two firms engaged in collusion (which, of course, totally doesn't happen because it
is against the law). Which outcome would…
arrow_forward
rock paper scissors
гock
0.
-3
1
рарer
1.
-1
scissors
-1
3
0.
(a) Show that xT= ( ) and yT= (3) together are not a Nash equilibrium
3 3
313
for this modified
game.
(b) Formulate a linear program that can be used to calculate a mixed strategy
x € A(R) that maximises Rosemary's security level for this modified
game.
(c) Solve your linear program using the 2-phase simplex algorithm. You should
use the format given in lectures. Give a mixed strategy x E A(R) that has an
optimal security level for Rosemary and a mixed strategy y E A(C) that has
an optimal security level for Colin.
arrow_forward
es
What are the necessary features of a prisoner's dilemma-type game?
Check All That Apply
Two prisoners must be locked in separate jail cells.
There must be a unique Nash equilibrium.
The Nash equilibrium outcome must be inefficient.
The game must have exactly three players.
The game must have a dominant strategy.
arrow_forward
Consider this extensive form game. The top number is player 1’s payoff, themiddle number is player 2’s payoff, and the bottom number is player 3’spayoff.a. Describe the general form of a strategy for each player.b. Find the SPNE.
arrow_forward
Player 1
b
C
d
Player 2
X y
3,2
1,1 4,3
3,5
1,3 3,0 2,4
1,5
2,1 0,1 1,2
1,0
1,0 2,0 2,1 4,2
W
N
. Does this game have any strategies that are strictly dominated?
arrow_forward
K
In a game, there are two players: Player 1 and Player 2. They have two strategies to select from, A and B. Where the
first payoff and the second payoff in every cell is for Player 1 and Player 2 respectively.
Which of the following is an example of a game without a dominant strategy? (Check all that apply.)
A.
C.
Player 1
Player 1
A
B
A
B
A
3,-3
1, 1
A
2,1
0,0
Player 2
Player 2
B
3, -3
5, -5
B
0,0
1,2
B.
D.
Player 1
Player 1
A
B
A
B
A
1,-1
-1, 1
Player 2
Player 2
A
3.5, -1.5
2.7, -1
B
-1, 1
1,-1
B
-5, 3
0,0
If the dominant strategy for Player 1 is selecting strategy A and the dominant strategy for Player 2 is strategy B, then A B
is an example of a
c From
ame C
Murat
Çok Di
id Kushn
y
My Hand
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305971493
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781285165875
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Related Questions
- Consider the following game: Player 2 In Out Player 1 In -2,-2 2, 0 Out 0, 2 0, 0 (a) What is the Nash equilibrium of this game, or what are the Nash equilibriaof this game? (b) Does either firm have a dominate strategy (a strategy that is always abest response)? Which? (c) Suppose Player 1 could move before Player 2 and Player 2 could observe Player 1’s move. What do you think would happen?arrow_forwardPlayer 1 Cooperate (C) Defect (D) Cooperate (C) 3,3 8,0 Player 2 Defect (D) 0,8 1,1 In general, a combination of strategies is a Nash equilibrium if ... Every player is choosing a best response against the other players' strategies. Every player has a positive payoff. The players maximize the sum of their payoffs. The players choose identical strategies. If the game is repeated, which cooperative actions could benefit both players? O Both players choose C. Player 1 chooses C, Player 2 chooses D. O Player 1 chooses D, Player 2 chooses C. Both players choose D.arrow_forwardSolve for the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) in each of the following games. (a) The following two-by-two game is a little harder to solve since firm 2’spreferred strategy depends of what firm 1 does. But firm 1 has a dominantstrategy so this game has one Nash equilibrium. Firm 2 Launch Don’tFirm 1 Launch 60, -10 100, 0 Don’t 80, 30 120, 0 What is the Nash equilibrium of this simultaneous-move game? (b) What would the outcome of this game be if instead firm 1 moved first and then, after seeing what firm 1 chose, firm 2 chose it strategy? In this case firm 1 doesn’t necessarily need to choose a best response, but firm 2 must choose a best response since it moves second.arrow_forward
- Player 1 Cooperate (C) Defect (D) If the game has a dominant strategy, what is it? There is none. If the game has a Nash equilibrium in pure strategies, what is it? There is none. Cooperate (C) 3,3 8,0 Cooperate (C) is a dominant strategy for both players. Defect (D) is a dominant strategy for both players. Cooperate (C) is a dominant strategy for 1, and Defect (D) is a dominant strategy for 2. C, C is the only Nash equilibrium. D, D is the only Nash equilibrium. C, C and D, D are both Nash equilibria. Player 2 Defect (D) 0,8 1,1arrow_forward5. The following problem was first considered by John von Neumann and is a fundamentalresult game theory.A and B play the following game:A writes down either number 1 or number 2, and B must guess which one.If the number that A has written down is i and B has guessed correctly, B receives i units from A.If B makes a wrong guess, B pays 4/5 of a unit to A.First we consider the expected gain of player B.Suppose B guesses 1 with probability p and 2 with probability 1 −p.Let X1 denote B’s gain (or loss) in a game where A has written down 1.Let X2 denote B’s gain (or loss) in a game where A has written down 2.(a) Find the pmf of X1 and X2(b) Find B’s expected gain for these two cases, E[X1] and E[X2].(c) What value of p maximizes the minimum possible value of B’s expected gain?Now consider the expected loss of player ASuppose that A writes down 1 with probability q and 2 with probability 1 −q.Let Y1 be A’s loss (or gain) if B chooses number 1.Let Y2 be A’s loss (or gain) if B…arrow_forwardAedri Quick Lesson in Game Theory A Nash Equilibrium is an outcome in which neither player is better off by changing their strategy. 2.7 Is a Dominant Strategy equilibrium also a Nash equilibrium? a) Yes b) No esc The Ice Cream Guys $3.99 $4.99 + Chucky's Chunky CCT: $20,000 $3.99 ICG: $20,000 CCT: $60,000 ICG: $10,000 tab Treats CCT: $10,000 $4.99 ICG: $60,000 CCT: $40,000 ICG: $40,000 The table above is the payoff matrix for the annual profit of the only two ice-cream-truck firms operating in Beach City. They are deciding the price of an ice cream cone. %3D caps lo 2.8 What is Chucky's dominant strategy? a) $3.99 b) $4.99 c) Not enough information hift 2.9 What is the dominant strategy equilibrium in this situation? a) Both charge $3.99 b) Both charge $4.99 c) CCT charges $3.99 and ICG charges $4.99 d) CCT charges $4.99 and ICG charges $3.99 2.10 Suppose these two firms engaged in collusion (which, of course, totally doesn't happen because it is against the law). Which outcome would…arrow_forward
- rock paper scissors гock 0. -3 1 рарer 1. -1 scissors -1 3 0. (a) Show that xT= ( ) and yT= (3) together are not a Nash equilibrium 3 3 313 for this modified game. (b) Formulate a linear program that can be used to calculate a mixed strategy x € A(R) that maximises Rosemary's security level for this modified game. (c) Solve your linear program using the 2-phase simplex algorithm. You should use the format given in lectures. Give a mixed strategy x E A(R) that has an optimal security level for Rosemary and a mixed strategy y E A(C) that has an optimal security level for Colin.arrow_forwardes What are the necessary features of a prisoner's dilemma-type game? Check All That Apply Two prisoners must be locked in separate jail cells. There must be a unique Nash equilibrium. The Nash equilibrium outcome must be inefficient. The game must have exactly three players. The game must have a dominant strategy.arrow_forwardConsider this extensive form game. The top number is player 1’s payoff, themiddle number is player 2’s payoff, and the bottom number is player 3’spayoff.a. Describe the general form of a strategy for each player.b. Find the SPNE.arrow_forward
- Player 1 b C d Player 2 X y 3,2 1,1 4,3 3,5 1,3 3,0 2,4 1,5 2,1 0,1 1,2 1,0 1,0 2,0 2,1 4,2 W N . Does this game have any strategies that are strictly dominated?arrow_forwardK In a game, there are two players: Player 1 and Player 2. They have two strategies to select from, A and B. Where the first payoff and the second payoff in every cell is for Player 1 and Player 2 respectively. Which of the following is an example of a game without a dominant strategy? (Check all that apply.) A. C. Player 1 Player 1 A B A B A 3,-3 1, 1 A 2,1 0,0 Player 2 Player 2 B 3, -3 5, -5 B 0,0 1,2 B. D. Player 1 Player 1 A B A B A 1,-1 -1, 1 Player 2 Player 2 A 3.5, -1.5 2.7, -1 B -1, 1 1,-1 B -5, 3 0,0 If the dominant strategy for Player 1 is selecting strategy A and the dominant strategy for Player 2 is strategy B, then A B is an example of a c From ame C Murat Çok Di id Kushn y My Handarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305971493Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781285165875Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningExploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305971493
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781285165875
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc