A risk-averse expected-utility maximizer has initial wealth w0 and utility function u. She faces a risk of a financial loss of L dollars, which occurs with probability π. An insurance company offers to sell a policy that costs p dollars per dollar of coverage (per dollar paid back in the event of a loss). Denote by x the number of dollars of coverage. (a) Give the formula for her expected utility V (x) as a function of x. (b)  Suppose that u(z) = −e −zλ , π = 1/4, L = 100 and p = 1/3. Write V (x) using these values. There should be three variables, x, λ and w. Find the optimal value of x, as a function of λ and w, by solving the first-order condition (set the derivative of the expected utility with respect to x equal to zero). (The second-order condition for this problem holds but you do not need to check it.) Does the optimal amount of coverage increase or decrease in λ, where λ > 0? (c)  Repeat exercise (b), but with p = 1/6. (d) You should find that for either (b) or (c), the optimal coverage is increasing in λ, and that in the other case it is decreasing in λ. Reconcile these two results.

Microeconomic Theory
12th Edition
ISBN:9781337517942
Author:NICHOLSON
Publisher:NICHOLSON
Chapter7: Uncertainty
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 7.5P
icon
Related questions
Question

A risk-averse expected-utility maximizer has initial wealth w0 and utility function u. She faces
a risk of a financial loss of L dollars, which occurs with probability π. An insurance company
offers to sell a policy that costs p dollars per dollar of coverage (per dollar paid back in the
event of a loss). Denote by x the number of dollars of coverage.
(a) Give the formula for her expected utility V (x) as a function of x.
(b)  Suppose that u(z) = −e
−zλ
, π = 1/4, L = 100 and p = 1/3. Write V (x)
using these values. There should be three variables, x, λ and w. Find the optimal value of x,
as a function of λ and w, by solving the first-order condition (set the derivative of the expected
utility with respect to x equal to zero). (The second-order condition for this problem holds but
you do not need to check it.) Does the optimal amount of coverage increase or decrease in λ,
where λ > 0?
(c)  Repeat exercise (b), but with p = 1/6.
(d) You should find that for either (b) or (c), the optimal coverage is increasing in λ,
and that in the other case it is decreasing in λ. Reconcile these two results.

Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 5 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Probability and Expected Value
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomic Theory
Microeconomic Theory
Economics
ISBN:
9781337517942
Author:
NICHOLSON
Publisher:
Cengage