2. Does inspection of the data in the table show a correlation (interconnection) between the magnitude of the quake and loss of human life? a. Yes b. No 3. Some countries appear more than once over the years. Comment about any changes generally in the human deaths from 1900 to 1950 (Hint; E.g. Japan, 1923 and Japan, 1933, 1946, 1948). What in your estimation has contributed to the reduction (or alternatively increase) in deaths from quakes over the years of 1900 to 2006?:

Essentials Health Info Management Principles/Practices
4th Edition
ISBN:9780357191651
Author:Bowie
Publisher:Bowie
Chapter7: Numbering & Filing Systems And Record Storage & Circulation
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 18CR
icon
Related questions
Question
Major earthquakes from 1900-1950, magnitude-human fatality
table below:
Date Location
1905 Kangra, India
1906 San Francisco, CA
1906 Valparaiso, Chile
1907 Central Asia
1908
1908
Messina, Italy
1915 Avezzano, Italy
1918 Mona Passage, PR
1920 Gansu, China
1920
1923 Yokohama, Japan
1925 Yunnan, China
1927 Tsinghai, China
1932 Gansu, China
1933 Japan
1933 Long Beach, CA
1934 Bihar-Napal, India
1934
1935 Taiwan (Formosa)
1935
1935 Quetta, Pakistan
1939 Chillian, Chile
1939 Erzincan, Turkey
1946 Honshu, Japan
1948 Fukui, Japan
Courtesy: www.inspiration.com
Deaths
19.000
3,000
20.000
12,000
83.000
29,980
116
200,000
143,000
5.000
200.000
70,000
2,990
115
10,700
3.276
50,000
28.000
30,000
1,330
5.390
Magnitude Country
India
United States
8.6
7.7
8.6 Chile
8.1
7.5 Italy
7.5 Italy
7.5
-
United States
8.6
China
39
8.3 Japan
7.1 China
8.3 China
7.6 China
8.9 Japan
62
United States
8.4 India
74 Taiwan
7.5 Pakistan
8.3 Chile
8.0 Turkey
8.4 Japan
7.3 Japan
2. Does inspection of the data in the table show a correlation
(interconnection) between the magnitude of the quake and
loss of human life?
a. Yes
b. No
3. Some countries appear more than once over the years.
Comment about any changes generally in the human deaths
from 1900 to 1950 (Hint; E.g. Japan, 1923 and Japan, 1933,
1946, 1948). What in your estimation has contributed to the
reduction (or alternatively increase) in deaths from quakes
over the years of 1900 to 2006?:
Transcribed Image Text:Major earthquakes from 1900-1950, magnitude-human fatality table below: Date Location 1905 Kangra, India 1906 San Francisco, CA 1906 Valparaiso, Chile 1907 Central Asia 1908 1908 Messina, Italy 1915 Avezzano, Italy 1918 Mona Passage, PR 1920 Gansu, China 1920 1923 Yokohama, Japan 1925 Yunnan, China 1927 Tsinghai, China 1932 Gansu, China 1933 Japan 1933 Long Beach, CA 1934 Bihar-Napal, India 1934 1935 Taiwan (Formosa) 1935 1935 Quetta, Pakistan 1939 Chillian, Chile 1939 Erzincan, Turkey 1946 Honshu, Japan 1948 Fukui, Japan Courtesy: www.inspiration.com Deaths 19.000 3,000 20.000 12,000 83.000 29,980 116 200,000 143,000 5.000 200.000 70,000 2,990 115 10,700 3.276 50,000 28.000 30,000 1,330 5.390 Magnitude Country India United States 8.6 7.7 8.6 Chile 8.1 7.5 Italy 7.5 Italy 7.5 - United States 8.6 China 39 8.3 Japan 7.1 China 8.3 China 7.6 China 8.9 Japan 62 United States 8.4 India 74 Taiwan 7.5 Pakistan 8.3 Chile 8.0 Turkey 8.4 Japan 7.3 Japan 2. Does inspection of the data in the table show a correlation (interconnection) between the magnitude of the quake and loss of human life? a. Yes b. No 3. Some countries appear more than once over the years. Comment about any changes generally in the human deaths from 1900 to 1950 (Hint; E.g. Japan, 1923 and Japan, 1933, 1946, 1948). What in your estimation has contributed to the reduction (or alternatively increase) in deaths from quakes over the years of 1900 to 2006?:
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer